Categories
Spurs match reports

Spurs 1-4 Brighton: Five Tottenham Talking Points

1. Bentancur’s Hangover Cure

I don’t think I’m speaking out of turn when I describe this one as “inconsequential”. The definition the nearest dictionary throws out me is “Adjective: Not important or significant”, and while I assume that professionalism forbad The Brains Trust from imparting such sage and accurate assessment to our heroes immediately prior to kick-off, the unspoken word was very evidently firing on all cylinders. Everyone knew. Never mind that a full house was in attendance, the outcome of this one was not really the key issue that had the masses gripped.

Nevertheless, before our heroes could provide cold, hard and shiny evidence of being trophy-winners and champions of Europe, there was a match to be played, so the appropriate pleasantries were undertaken.

And I suspect I was as surprised as anyone else in the auditorium when various members of the collective burst out of the traps. After events of the preceding 72 or so hours, sprightliness and energy were frankly the last things I was expecting to see. One did not have to be one of the great literary sleuths to work out that our heroes had flung heart and soul into enjoying the moment – and to a man, woman and child we applauded them and egged them on.

If AANP were asked to put a hand on the Bible and commit to telling the truth and nothing but, he would admit to having sucked of the sauce when circumstances demanded, and even of having over-indulged in this area on the rare, regrettable occasion. But it is with the benefit of this experience that I can assert with some confidence that while the imbibing of choice elixirs can be an absolute hoot in the moment – with the right company about, and the right concoction in hand – what comes to pass in the following days can prove seriously challenging to the constitution.

It was in this context that I expected a near-total absence of enthusiasm from our heroes. You can therefore picture my surprise on observing that Rodrigo Bentancur began the game as arguably the most animated of the entire gang.

Here was a man who seemingly had refused to stand upright unless clutching a vial of some description in the hand in the days following our win. By all accounts he also refused to sleep for a day or so after our triumph, evidently reasoning that Nature’s Sweet Restorer comes a distant second to immersing oneself in the joy of a European trophy win.

No blame attached there at all, but where he therefore found the vim to tear around the pitch from the opening whistle, flying into challenges as if his life depended on them, was beyond me. In my experience, a soft pillow and some closed curtains are the principal requirements after a few consecutive days on the bottle. The moral of that particular story seemed to be to find out the morning-after cure adopted by our Uruguayan cousins and cherish it as gold dust.

In fact, if anything, Bentancur was swanning about the place with a bit too much spice. An early challenge down by the byline seemed to have about it much of the two-feet-leaving-the-ground, and only a linesman’s flag for offside negated that at source as an argument, but shortly before half-time he did pick up a caution, as possibly his fifth full-length diving challenge of the afternoon delivered a harvest of Ball – None; Man – Plenty.

All this was particularly striking because although Bentancur is not exactly a stranger to a yellow card, his is a reputation that has been built more upon the cerebral and well-anticipated interception, rather than the crunching, not-too-many-damns-given flying boot.

However, a midfield incarnation of Romero on his more hot-headed days was evidently the persona he wished to adopt yesterday, and that decision having been made he embraced it with gusto. Allowing for those occasional errant and mistimed challenges, this was a midfield performance that was pretty impressive.

2. Gray

Another who caught the AANP eye in that punchy first half was Archie Gray. His has been quite the character arc this season. As we all recall, having been shoved into central defence, and presumably advised to enjoy himself but keep mistakes to a minimum, he proceeded to flabbergast by patrolling the region like a seasoned pro, and was feted accordingly. When he therefore finally received his chance in his preferred midfield habitat, lips were licked and gleeful hands rubbed.

Alas, and as was again well documented, what had been presented as a pretty surefire winner, went alarmingly wrong. His performance in midfield against Liverpool in particular was pretty ghastly stuff, and while one might reason with some justification that he hasn’t been quite as bad in midfield since, this truth does nevertheless overlook the fact that he has not been particularly good in midfield since, either.

Until yesterday, that is, when in the first half I thought he pottered about with a bit of meaning. It was what one might have termed a pretty decent Bentancur Tribute Act. He intercepted, he picked passes and he tackled – the latter talent notably deployed in winning possession high up the pitch in the episode that immediately resulted in Tel scurrying into the area and winning the penalty.

The inconsequential air that hung around the place throughout meant that useful conclusions drawn were at a premium, and any performances, rip-snorting or otherwise, were best advised to be taken with a generous pinch of salt. Nevertheless, I was encouraged to see real-life evidence that, when the stars align, Archie Gray actually can hit various of the right notes in a midfield role.

3. Danso

Kevin Danso was another who, on a day and in a match of greater consequence, might have earned himself a complimentary inclination of the head.

The case of Kevin Danso specifically at AANP Towers has been a slightly rummy one so far this season, because practically everyone with whom I have conversed on the topic has rather brightly suggested that here’s a one with something about him, only to be met with one of my more dubious eyes. Which is not to say I thought he’d stunk out the place so far; more that I hadn’t really been bowled over by his defensive contributions. One of those non-committal shrugs accompanied by one of those non-committal platitudes summed up the AANP take on the chap to date.

That started to change on Wednesday night, when I thought he was note-perfect in his little defensive cameo, to help us see the thing home. It was not an occasion that called for vision and distribution, just clear-headed thinking and a willingness to fling all available limbs into the line of fire.

Having impressed thus, he was given a slightly different remit yesterday, tasked with overseeing defensive matters instead of rather than alongside Romero. With VDV given an hour on the left of the centre-backs, Danso was presumably required to do Romero-type things, such as winning headers and cutting out crosses, and in the first half in particular he impressed in these respects.

If this could be considered an audition of sorts, for the role of Romero understudy, one might suggest that he did enough to earn a couple more stabs. Faultless it wasn’t, but whereas for example Dragusin has sometimes given the impression of a chap who lied in his interview and is being found out now that the real stuff has kicked in, Danso at least gives the impression that he knows what is expected and has played the part before.

4. Tel

A quick word too on Tel, who put in one of those shifts that had me hesitantly hovering the finger over a few different categories.

On the one hand one could make a reasonable argument that, in the first half, the opposing right-back would not have been thrilled to discover that pretty much the entirety of the Tottenham game-plan involved switching the ball to Tel and letting him run. One did not get the impression that the nearest Brighton chappie punched the air and mouthed to his chums, “Leave this one to me” each time the aforementioned routine was put in motion. And if a player’s worth can be gauged by how little thrilled the opposition are by his inputs, then one might suggest Tel added value.

And to embellish the whole argument, one might also point to the fact that it was Tel’s fleetness of foot that won us our penalty. It was clumsy muck from the Brighton squirt, but all the more credit to Tel for enticing such clog-headedness.

On the other hand, however, the AANP map did produce a few frowns as the half wore on, because for all the service he was given, Tel’s ‘End Product’ sack looked pretty empty. The penalty earned is to his credit; but he seemed to have four or five other opportunities to run at his full-back and either tiptoe past him or set up an arriving chum, and I don’t recall him doing either.

Moreover, I do recall him wasting a glorious chance to put us two-nil up later in the first half. One suspects that our bleary-eyed heroes would still have found a way to fritter away such a lead, but nevertheless, it did not reflect too well on young Tel. The disclaimer, however, remains, that this was not really one upon which lasting judgements should be based.

5. The Second Half Hangover

One theory that has reached the AANP ears is that our heroes began the game with the adrenaline of the occasion still coursing through them. With the cheers of the adoring public still ringing in their ears, and the celebratory atmosphere still very much in evidence in the build-up to the game, it has been suggested that come kick-off a rush of euphoria inhabited our heroes, driving them in general, and Bentancur in particular, to impressive heights.

Mark the sequel, however, because the theory continues that by the time the second half scooted into view, that well of adrenaline had begun to run dry. And when that happened, the after-effects of the three-day party really did begin to hit our heroes.

Impressed though I was that none of them actually collapsed on their backs and declared that they had had enough, or crawled over to the nearest lavatory bowl into which they could stick their head, I nevertheless received the distinct impression in that second half that the race was run. The pungent aromas of the previous days’ festivities almost visibly began to creep up on them. While substitutions were made, the fact that those entering the fray had themselves left mountains of evidence of their revelry rather suggested that their impact would be minimal, and so it proved.

However, in the manner that some modern films now do when they try too hard to be clever, I return to the opening line of all this, and stress that this was all pretty inconsequential. Put another way, in years to come, I’m not too sure that many in lilywhite will introduce this as the day on which Spurs lost 4-1, or excitedly babble “I was there on the day we shipped four in the second half alone.”

But “I was there on the day Spurs paraded their European trophy around the pitch”? It’s one to remember.

AANP’s book ‘All Action No Plot: Postecoglou’s First Season’, is out now for just £7.99 from Amazon (ebook from £6.99– while Spurs’ Cult Heroes, covering our previous European triumphs, is also still available

Sharing is daring:

23 replies on “Spurs 1-4 Brighton: Five Tottenham Talking Points”

Inconsequential? Debatable, though we may know soon enough. Even the most bleary-eyed Europa reveller would have to acknowledge that winning ugly, grimly, desperately against the 5th-worst team in the PL can’t hide the reality that say, Brighton – or any of a dozen others – would have trounced us on Wednesday the way they did on Sunday.
A win, any win, against Brighton might have sustained the illusion that Ange has the wherewithal and nous to manage at the highest level – but no, we saw a team yet again being routinely outplayed.
Inconsequential? Not for Ange, I sincerely hope.
The gift, the bonus, the winning lottery ticket of a place in the Champions League must be acted upon with optimism and purpose, which means under the management of somebody who can take the club forward and not be a twice-weekly embarrassment.

As ever, AANP, a pleasure to read. Have a great summer and let’s hope we can all meet again in August, Ange or no Ange.

It was also the day on which Spurs became the first club to lose 22 matches in a single season without being relegated, and on which they achieved their second lowest points total since they joined the Football League in 1908 (adjusted for the two points to three per win change in 1981, obviously).
Does winning a grossly-devalued trophy like the EL really compensate for the disgrace of such mismanagement and lack of professionalism? Sorry – not in my book, and getting rid of Postecoglou must be the first step towards ensuring that this season’s unacceptable level of performance doesn’t continue into next.
The CL won’t be the cushy proposition that the EL certainly was, even for a club like this season’s Tottenham, and if Postecoglou admits that he can only manage one campaign at a time (as he has, justifying the abysmal PL performance by the supposed demands of seeing-off the likes of Qarabag and Alkmaar in Europe), we’re surely doomed to another season like the last, but probably without the prize of a CL win at the end!
Just because Levy has got sackings wrong in the past, it doesn’t mean that they’re never justified, and no manager has deserved the sack more than the current one.

The Spurs fans in Bilbao, the many thousands on the streets of North London, and those that remained after the game on Sunday would not not agree with the idea that the Europa League is some kind of grossly-devalued trophy. Statements like that are simply made to support an Ange-out argument. There are good reasons for making a change of manager, but you have to be sure you are getting someone to replace him that has the experience to manage the challenge of a potential 60 game season with the European trip’s before doing so, especially as the players do seem to be pretty on-board with Ange.

The devaluation of the EL from the old UEFA Cup is surely a matter of fact, not opinion. When Spurs won the latter, the only top teams not participating were the champions and the cup-winners, leaving a pretty strong field to overcome, which we did, twice. The EL consists of whoever’s left after the CL contingent is removed (the top five plus us next season), and no longer takes group losers from the CL, so is it really such an achievement to come through against such a disparate group of unknowns and third-raters as we did, getting past the only two sides with any status courtesy of a penalty in Frankfurt and an own-goal (which it clearly was) in Bilbao.
As for the players’ feelings for Postecoglou, they’ve been putting in sub-standard performances for most of the past two seasons, but only Werner seems to have felt his wrath, the rest of them seeming happy to coast along, losing twice as often as winning in the PL, and being sheltered behind his ‘it’s who we are mate’ nonsensical mantra. I’d like to see them receiving a well-deserved boot up their collective backside from our next manager, whoever he is (and whoever he is, he’s bound to be an improvement on the current clown).

Thank you so much AANP for your absorbing take on the matches this season, I’d definitely stump up for a season ticket if it has a price on it 🙂

Next season will need a significant uplift from this one so I think the writing’s on the wall for Ange. Not sure some of the reported potential replacement’s have the necessary background to deliver it either, I just hope we get a good one.

AANP is the only online site I respect without reservation. Win or lose I look forward with great anticipation to each post-game report because the author is actually an “author”…meaning his material is presented in a balanced, professional manner, complete with reasonable conclusions and laced with a thoroughly unique sense of humor. I am generally in accord with the author’s opinions and in this case my agreement is unilateral. Yes, we are all disappointed with the league results but winning that trophy washes all those sins away. For those who disagree perhaps they should do some research on the history of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. The trophy cabinet is not so full that we should through back the little ones.

In the 25 years that teams dropped out of the Champions League only 8 won the Europa, so pretty low return from 200 teams. You may recall we bombed at the first hurdle when we dropped out during our Wembley residency.
I wasn’t aware that penalties or own goals somehow didn’t count – another attempt to devalue a great achievement surely, which I just don’t get from a Spurs fan I’m afraid.
Interesting info on BBC today. Our previous three trophy winning seasons we finished 11th, 11th and 10th in the league. When we won the cup in 91 Venables managed a team that slipped from 3rd, winning just once from the last 15 games – can’t say I remember that. I do remember winning the cup with an own goal though. ?

Penalties and own goals obviously count, but can’t rank alongside ‘real’ goals, like Ricky Villa’s in the ’81 FA Cup Final, or Gazza’s in the ’91 Semi, at least not for me, and our failure to ‘score’ anything other than a joke own goal in the EL Final, or to register a single shot on target in the second half, very much diminishes the achievement – we’re Spurs, not Dave Bassett’s Wimbledon ‘Dogs of War’ for heaven’s sake!
My reference to the CL dropouts was secondary to the absence of the runners-up and near-miss clubs from the EL format, and it’s surely easier to beat Bodo/Glimt in the semis than it was to see-off AC Milan, as we had to at the same stage of the UEFA Cup in 1972.
I’ve mislaid my programme for that match, but I seem to recall an article by a guest writer in which he said that it was more difficult to win the UEFA Cup than the European Cup, because of the extra rounds and the greater spread of quality in the former – that’s a matter of opinion, but no one today would seriously make that claim for the EL over the CL, would they?
No respectable coach/manager throws the league just in order to chase a cup, but that’s what Postecoglou claims he did, justifying the terrible PL results by the supposed impossibility of competing on two fronts, even though other clubs manage it regularly.
As for Spurs tailing-off in ’91, we – like all clubs of that era – had much smaller squads, with a first eleven plus maybe half-a-dozen backups, whereas 25 experienced, often international players is the norm among the bigger clubs, even Tottenham, so our ‘slipping’ to 17th is far less excusable than in Venables’s case,
You don’t mention Postecoglou at all, but he’s the target that my posts are aimed-at, the club sadly being tarnished by association with the worst manager we’ve had in my lifetime, with the possible exception only of Ardiles. If he’s still here next season, I don’t expect any improvement, but if Levy for once gets the new appointment right, there’s hope that the squad can be properly and successfully used, rather than in Postecoglou’s childish ‘tactics’ of all-out attack or desperate defence, with no happy medium. Ange Out!

Just for the record, I feel obliged to correct my ‘dogs of war’ reference above – Bassett’s Wimbledon were The Crazy Gang (who was ‘Monsewer Eddie Gray, I wonder?) while Joe Royle’s Everton were the Dogs of War. Must try harder.

The Brighton loss was a microcosm of the Spurs’ season. At the very least it can be said that the very term “Spursy” has a new meaning: clinical schizophrenia. True, the team won the third-most important title in Europe–in their real lives in the Premiership, they behaved precisely as if they were sabotaging their manager and wished only his removal. I think it hasn’t sunk in either to the players or the fans, in the misplaced euphoria of their trophy win, exactly how close they came to relegation. It was a consistently shameful year-long performance, indicative of deep institutional rot, and will be remembered long after the trophy and Postecoglou are forgotten.

I fall into the group that does not feel that our season has been “outstanding” (Postecoglou’s assessment) when we lost 22 League games and finished 17th. I would call it somewhere between dismal and abysmal. I acknowledge that winning the Europa League Cup was a fine achievement. That’s all! The sour taste of so many lousy performances throughout the season remains. Cheshuntboy (between me & my keyboard I always think of him as Chestnutboy because he enjoys giving a good roasting) is on the money when he says you cannot throw the League to win a Cup albeit to gain entry to the Champions League. One of my Spurs-supporting mates believes that being in the UCL will attract better quality players – I fear it will attract only “pot-hunters” not players who will buy into the continuing Spurs Project, which is build a football team that matches the Stadum and the Training facilities and reflects the very special principles of THFC. More than anything we need a Head Coach and staff that will buy in. Not only do we have Postecoglou claiming we’ve had an outstanding season, he is also commenting on the need to “bring in more experienced players” in close season transfer dealings. How will our young players react to or be motivated by that statement? How will outstanding youngsters like Jamie Donley and Luka Vuskovic react? Surely our better performing players this year have been from the younger generation? We don’t need experience, we need expertise, technical skills and tactical awareness from the players and the coaching staff. Talking of young players, there are 2 ex-Academt boys in the promoted Sunderland team, Dennis Cirkin and Romaine Mundle. I haven’t seen much of Cirkin but I had been a great fan of Mundle and was gob-smacked when Spurs management allowed him to turn down a new contract and move on.
My final word is on the players post-final celebrations; how the club sanctioned that behaviour so close to a league game is beyond me, Bill Nick will be spinning in his grave!

Totally agree, especially with your final para – utterly unprofessional, but that’s Spurs 2025. The club motto should be ‘wha’ever’ (wha’ever that is in Latin!).

I’m closer to Women of the Lane’s Ali Speechly (on the BBC website), although she may me a touch too enthusiastic with her scoring:

“Season rating: 10/10. This season was mostly devastating and could easily be scored two out of 10, but we won a trophy so it was ultimately delightful, Therefore, I’m with Ange Postecoglou on this one: outstanding! And much better than finishing second and trophyless – again.
Happy with your manager? It’s hard not to be happy with a manager who has done what so many others have failed to do for our club. In addition to the trophy, there were also glimmers of positivity in the Premier League – I think you can see what he is trying to build. However, I can’t ignore the injuries and inconsistencies which dogged our season – so, if Ange does stay, he’s still got lots of work to do.“

Also an interesting graphic on the BBC about how Spurs run a lot, and also run fast a lot. Only Bournemouth seem to be on a similar level. Probably why both teams have had more than their share of injuries.

Will be enlightening to see how much Chelsea celebrate tonight when they win, unless Lo Celso and his chums can upset them.

Whatever happens in the Summer, COYS!

Spurs run a lot because that’s what Postecoglou’s wants, and they therefore get a lot of injuries. The two things go together, so it’s not about luck or fair shares, but about sensible tactics and use of players, and we’ve got a coach who’s clueless on both.

I think there must be more to it though because Spurs ranked second in running distance four years in a row under Poch? I don’t believe we had big injury issues then.

We won a trophy. Be honest, we don’t do that much. If it were that easy to win a European trophy, any of the several other non-“clown manager”s in the competition would have managed it.
It’s a European trophy, don’t cheat yourself out of the joy. Enjoy it.

However, it’s embarrassing for Spurs to have such a PL season (note that I said “PL” season – the Woolwich contingency will gladly swap their season with ours in a heartbeat). One thing is very clear – you’ll come back to this – Ange can’t defend and attack at the same time, but he does know how to do either. Apparently not good enough for Spurs. We deserve the Liverpool treatment more than the Crystal Palace one i.e we’re big enough to compete on all fronts.

Kudos and gratitude to AP for having the sense to do what it takes to break the 17 year old duck, thereby hopefully opening the floodgates. But it might be well advised to hand the brave, newly victorious ship to a capable captain, versed enough to convert One to Several.

p.s: defense is just as important as attack, and “to dare is to do” also emcompasses the will to flex your joints in a quite daring manner to keep one out your own net, as beautiful taught by MVDV. We defended like the Greats, conquered the arctic circle’s finest in their crib, and brought Home the glory while dunking on our rival’s heads. Revel in it. COYS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.