Categories
Spurs match reports

Man City 1-0 Spurs: Three Tottenham Talking Points

AANP’s new book ‘All Action No Plot: Postecoglou’s First Season’, is out now for just £7.99 from Amazon (ebook from £6.99)

1. Defenders Who’d Rather Not Defend. Again.

One of those peculiar assemblies this one, the sort after which everyone oozes out struggling to make sense of what they witnessed. Head swimming like I’d just watched an arty European film in which the leading man changes into a beetle halfway through, I came away last night asking myself all sorts of pretty deep questions. Had we done well or badly? Ought I to have been disappointed? Did any of this actually matter, or was it all just pointless fluff to keep us busy until Thursday nights roll around and we shove all chips into the Europa pot?

In the first half our heroes laboured away pretty busily, without ever actually getting anywhere. So top marks for labouring I suppose. However, when the sum of it all is an about-turn on halfway and a pass south to the centre-backs, the kindly observer does don a puzzled look and politely wonder what the hell is the point of it all.

We actually had a chance to begin things in a blaze of glory, ferreting away into the City area as early as the first minute. Unfortunately, at this point both Johnson and Odobert became strangely reticent, and dallied shyly rather than striking at goal with all the fury they could muster.

And that was the last anyone was to see of our attacking routines for about an hour or so. The remainder of the first half was the usual rotten sauce, as our midfield simply melted away whenever City turned their attention to attack. Our defenders, themselves hardly the sorts to step in with authority and resolve all life’s ills, seemed somehow to take up stations everywhere except the most obvious and useful positions. Hot knives slicing through butter would have looked on enviously at City, as they advanced to zero resistance, time and time again.

It’s a familiar failing. Not the more palatable for its familiarity, but I suppose at least lacking any element of surprise or shock. “Death, taxes and a flimsy Spurs midfield”, was the chorus on the AANP lips throughout most of that first half.

And it’s a pretty regularly-banged drum around these parts, but as each cast member popped up to do their bit, I noted with a certain weariness that they all seemed so much more comfortable attacking than defending.

Here I don’t really blame them, actually. Whenever I donned the boots and got down to it, my interest was always primarily in the fun to be had when haring down on the opposition goal. There isn’t much glory to be had marking an opponent at a corner after all.

However, it’s one thing to indulge the attacking tendencies on a Powerleague pitch after work; but a pretty significant leap to be employed full-time as a Premier League defender. In the latter case, any urges towards attacking frivolity ought really to be dismissed from the mind. The priority surely ought to be to focus on one’s defensive eggs. What tricks might best be deployed to shimmy away from opponents and scuttle toward the opposition goal, is surely a matter that belongs a long way down the agenda, when one’s job title reads “Centre-Back” or something similar.

And yet, if one were to scrawl a list of ‘Strengths’ and ‘Weaknesses’ for our defenders, more often than not, under S. one would find such qualities as “Bursting forward from the back, with or without ball”.

Take young Danso, upon whom I’d been particularly eager to cast the hawk-like eye, AANP still gathering evidence on the chap at this stage. He certainly doesn’t want for enthusiasm, but seems to leap to the fore primarily when the opportunity arises to burst forward. Looking something like a young rabbit that has spent all day pent up in its hutch and suddenly had the door opened , there was little stopping the man when the ball was cleared up our left. He was off like a rocket, either carrying the ball himself or feverishly signalling to those in possession that he was advancing towards halfway and available for hire.

Porro was another, rather obvious example. In the opening minutes, when our lot dozed off and left Haaland of all people free to have a swipe from within the area (straight at Vicario), a brief once-over of the crime-scene revealed that it was Porro who had drifted off. As the City winger hit the byline, and Haaland took a sneaky step back, Porro, whose babysitting duties at that point pretty obviously included the giant Norwegian, was drawn to the ball like a moth to a flame, and ambled towards the goal-line, completely abandoning Haaland to the Fates.

It was not the first dereliction of duty on the Porro showreel, and presumably not the last. Fast forward an hour or so, however, and when our lot upped the general intensity and started banging away on the City door, there was little stopping Porro. Regularly to be seen flying up the right, barely had the door been opened to him and the butler cleared his throat to make formal announcements before Porro was barging his way in and lining up his crosses.

Marvellous crosses they were too, no denying that. Absolute pearlers, some of them, and had we eked out a goal there would not have been too many tuts of injustice about the place. So all hail Porro’s attacking onions; but that’s exactly the point. It’s not his attacking o. that we should be hailing. Nice to have, no doubt about it – but hardly the essence of his role as, lest we forget, right-back.

All rather futile moaning of course, Angeball is as Angeball does – which seems to mean that defensive work is rather optional, and the priority is for just about everyone to contribute to attacks as best they can. As my Spurs-supporting barber, Doug, put it this week, ours is a system that relies upon the goalkeeper to play out of his skin each week.

2. Vicario

On which note, Vicario played if not exactly out of his skin, then stretching his skin to its limits. There is of course far more to the ancient and noble art of goalkeeping than simply leaping about the place making saves – but that element does rather help, and Vicario was evidently well up on current events yesterday.

Not a great deal he might have done about the goal, so one waves the forgiving hand (while noting that Udogie, so prominent on the front-foot, was responsible for allowing Haaland the freedom of the 6-yard box at the crucial moment). In just about all other instances, however, when full-body extensions were required, and soft or firm hands as necessary, Vicario was very much the man with the answers.

And while one would not necessarily look back on last night as a masterclass in Passing From the Instep of the Goalkeeper, I do think one ought to offer the chap a small salute, simply for not putting a foot wrong in this discipline. Recently, young Kinsky has deputised, reasonably well I thought, but still showing an occasional tendency to shove his foot in his mouth when it came to short-passing, if you follow.

It was therefore comforting not to have to worry about any such mishaps befalling the crew members last night. Operation Pass Out From The Back is still ludicrous stuff, make no mistake, the sort of horrific fare one can only watch with heart in mouth and eyes peeping from behind the hands; but at least Vicario plays his part with the calm assurance of a man well drilled in the art.

3. Bergvall (In The First Half At Least)

The other fellow who caught the AANP eye was young Bergvall, or at least he did so until he didn’t, so to speak.

In the first half he conducted himself in a manner that suggested he did not simply consider that he belonged on this stage, but that in fact he held ownership rights to the thing, and consequently was master of all he surveyed. Every time he wandered toward the action for a spot of investigation and enquiry, he seemed to emerge from it with the ball attached to his feet, and a small legion of City sorts flailing at his fast-departing shadow.

It was terrific stuff, sullied only, as far as I could tell, by him occasionally losing his footing and finding himself unable then to prevent whatever disaster immediately befell – a City weevil gathering up the loose goods, most typically. In those moments, however, the forgiving hand was once again waved. The pre-eminent point was that Bergvall was damn near running the midfield show, at least in possession.

I thought this narrative took a bit of a swivel in the second half, at about the time our lot generally upped their game, oddly enough. What with substitutes entering from all angles and a spot of urgency sprinkled about the place, one slightly lost track of the various sub-plots. The general message, however, had already been communicated: Bergvall is as capable as the next man of puffing out his chest and directing traffic on a big occasion.

This is probably a useful juncture at which also to tip the cap at Archie Gray, who not for the first time seemed visibly to learn from mistakes and make adjustments as the game progressed. Come the final curtain however, being unsure of whether we’d done well or badly, or whether or not I ought to have been disappointed, I found it best to shrug off the whole thing as pointless fluff until the real business begins next Thursday in the Europa.

Sharing is daring:

6 replies on “Man City 1-0 Spurs: Three Tottenham Talking Points”

Good stuff. Yes, the question remains, do you “rest” your four best players against one of the best teams in Europe in order to have them fit and well in 8 days time. 60K people paid upwards of £60 each might have a view on that. A bit like going to a Saturday matinee in the West End and having a dep in for the star you paid upwards of £60 to see. I’m rambling, sorry.

Reminded me of when I went to see a Saturday Riverdance matinee as Michael Flatley had returned on Saturday’s only- I didn’t read the small print that he only did the evening show 🙂

Nothing came as a surprise last night, once again the team moved fast to get it to the front then worked hard to gradually get it back to Vicario. I remember this being a problem for Conte and he said that this was never part of their training. I don’t care if the ball ends up in the car park, but just hit the damn thing and see where it lands.

Same postgame feeling, wasn’t really sure how to feel? We should have been down 3 or 4 in the first half but given how we played in the 2nd, should have gotten something out of the game, right?

Same observations from just about every other week, fullbacks tucked in on defense, switch of field to the winger, let the fun begin! How many of those did Doku get in the first half? I mean you’d think Porro would make some sort of adjustment and at least get within shouting distance? But no, just going to let this continue over and over and over! The announcers we’re saying he needs some help, well no, not really, he just needs to at least to try and mark the guy! One of my kids play fullback and whenever he has a really fast, technical winger to mark, I always tell him, get out on him, get in his shirt, don’t let him receive the ball to feet and have a run at you, seems pretty basic stuff but these are professionals and must know better.

The sideways and back passing so frustrating, in the first 20 minutes, I saw Tel make a number of runs off the shoulder of his defender and was into space and not once did we try to pop one in there (well we did once but it was so misplaced I couldn’t tell who the pass was intended for). Porro was again front and center here, multiple opportunities to put him in but just gave a wave or thumbs-up instead “nice run Tel, maybe next time”!

Was Odobert wearing ankle weights in the first half? I mean it looked like he was stuck in glue, couldn’t be bothered to follow any runners on defense and on offense, had zero pop in the young legs. Second half a completely different player!

Second half much better but as usual, lacking a striker who can finish in front of goal, Son is not that player and Spurs must really like pounding sand because they continue to put him in there over and over with bad results. Would have Scarlett made a difference? Would have loved to find out.

Your frustration with Porro is almost tangible. But your points are spot on – do the blasted basics!
Agree on Scarlett, I get the desire to have Deki on the pitch, but it was a perfect opportunity to give Scarlett 20 against a top-notch defence, in a relatively low-stakes environment.

Agree with you. Play the better players first, then bring on the fringe players. We could have got something out of this game. It was our 7th loss in 14 home games now; poor. It’s been years since we were so poor at home. And with 5 home games still to come, I fear this will be an ugly end to the season if it is already not.

I can only have, in the main, reasons to be cheerful in spite of losing. I thought it was an excellent game and the neutral should have been well entertained. We know our defence doesn’t comprise solely of the back 5 and maybe that’s where we come short. Most of of our problems come through the right hand side of the backline and Porro takes the criticism but he doesn’t get much assistance especially from Johnson who in my fairly prejudiced opinion put in another half-hearted uncommitted performance. We generally gave as good as we got over 90 minutes – both teams missed good chances. Postecogelou has been criticised a lot for our poor results and although his argument about the length of the injured list is valid – we should also remember that he has not had the huge benefit that the 4 managers preceding him had – Harry Kane scoring 20+ goals a season.
I am still at odds with Postecogleu over team selection. How could he ever justify putting Werner on the bench and then giving him 15 minutes at the end when we know he has no long term future at the club and will have his feet up when we take on AK Alkmaar next week? I was surprised to see Tel given another run as our 9 and surprised again when Kulusevski and Son, took on the role. I had hoped Scarlett would start – he certainly should have come on at halftime. AANP highlighted Bergvall – what a performance- agreed it was not perfect- he ran up a couple of cul-de-sacs and towards the end he was running on fumes and misplaced passes – but he was still running. The way Bergvall and Spence, when he arrived, took on players by changing gear and direction was a joy. If you include the encouraging performance from Oderbert, another masterclass from Archie Gray you should understand my cheerfulness. Throw in Danso – yes as AANP noted – he does enjoy a romp forward – but he was also very much involved in making tackles and blocks in and around our penalty area. Throw in PM Sarr – castigated in at least one report I read – he had only 30 minutes but made the most of it and was fully committed to the cause at both ends of the pitch. He missed the chance to equalise at the death but the ball had bounced off Sonny’s back on the way to him – how could he take that into account in the time available to him?
I don’t think it unreasonable for our goalkeeper to play out of his skin every game. All the top teams in the league have invested in top quality keepers and if you look at the bottom 4 – their keepers can’t make up for the deficiencies in their co-defenders. Which reminds me of Pat Jennings acceptance speech when receiving Player of the Year way back when, he said that he wouldn’t have won it without the help of his back 4.

Comments are closed.