Categories
Uncategorized

Man City 0-2 Spurs: Four Tottenham Talking Points

1. Sarr

There seemed to be pretty broad consensus that young Sarr was yesterday’s standout chappie, and who am I to disagree with the masses? Top marks to the young nib, as for the second consecutive game he took the opening whistle as his cue to break into a gallop, and didn’t stop until the credits rolled.

If you were the sort of busy cove who, finding your weekend diary packed full of frivolities, found only the team to catch the 5-minutes highlights package on Match of the Day last night, the principal evidence for Sarr’s non-stop running routine would have been his contribution to the first goal in particular. For this, to remind, he went bounding across the pitch to the right flank, on around halfway, all for the purpose of leaping a few yards vertically and applying a spot of the old loaf to the ball as it cruised by, sending it into the path of Richarlison, who combined with Johnson to do the necessaries.

And if this had indeed been all you caught of Sarr’s input, one could readily assure you that the moment was not just a triumph in and of itself, but also a most appropriate representation of the young scally’s overall performance. “Neatly encapsulating”, would be one way of describing it. “Summed up his afternoon’s work,” would be another. Or perhaps “Captured his performance in a microcosm,” if you wanted to add a scientific element.

While he obviously didn’t spend the entire 90 minutes creating one goal after another through his relentless pattering about the place, he did seem to spend the entirety haring about to every corner, chasing causes that were both lost, found and all points in between. It seemed to me that if the ball were in play, there was a strong chance that a quick scanning of the eyes a few yards to the left or right would reveal young Sarr to be in hot pursuit.

Pleasingly, this was not a performance that could obviously be labelled as distinctly ‘Defensive’ or ‘Attacking’ either, for it seemed to include generous helpings from both Column A and Column B. Admittedly the days of our lot being stretched at the rear and in desperate need of reinforcements to come haring back and straining every sinew to prevent disaster (or, for ease of communication, ‘Angeball’) are a thing of the past, but this was City away, and there was therefore understandable need for the midfield johnnies to don a helmet and muck in with their defensive chums. In this defensive respect, Sarr was present and correct whenever needed.

And yet, similarly, when the situation demanded that attacking apparel be donned, Sarr required no second invitation – as noted above, with that opening goal.

Another positive offshoot of Sarr’s mind-boggling stamina in charging about the place was that it allowed Bentancur and Paulinha to get on with their principal duties – which seemed to be interceptions and tackles respectively – without being dragged all over the place. At the risk of sounding like a commercial for a household appliance, Sarr did the running so that they didn’t have to.

2. Paulinha

On the subject of Paulinha, I was thrilled to my very core to see a fellow willing to embrace the oft-neglected art of the good old-fashioned tackle.

These days, with tackles from behind outlawed, and fouls awarded for tackles that actually win the ball but then crunch a leg or two as an afterthought, one would be forgiven for thinking that the powers that be are hell-bent on creating a world in which tackles are removed from the game altogether, and those purveying them are smoked out and publicly humiliated as enemies of the state.

All too often last season, AANP would look on with dismay as opposing sorts cottoned on to the fact that they could waltz unopposed straight through the centre of our team, encountering not so much a wall of steel as a soft underbelly.

With Paulinha at the heart of things however, there is a bit more resistance about our lot. The general setup is decidedly more circumspect, in fact. Where last week Gray sat, and Sarr and Bergvall beavered willingly further north, yesterday Bentancur and Paulinha seemed fully alert to the fact that their primary duty was to patrol the fences and wag a finger of censure at anyone who tried to slip through.

One hesitates to suggest that this was the perfect defensive midfield performance from Paulinha. Plenty more that could be done, of course, in various respects. However, I’m not sure any amongst us could fail to have been stirred by the sight of a fellow adorned in lilywhite (or, as the case was yesterday, that rather dreamy, plain black number) throwing himself with gusto into one meaningful and full-blooded challenge after another.

Paulinha and Sarr were also conspicuous by their participation in the high press, of which AANP is also a fully signed-up fan. If City must dominate possession – as they surely will, more often than not – I rather like the logic of letting them do so in their own penalty area rather than ours, and doing a spot of pack-hunting while they’re at it, just to keep them on their toes.

As an added bonus, Paulinha even found time for a goal, which was jolly good form. It came from more of that high pressing, so it immediately earned an AANP thumbs up, and while one might argue that there was nothing terrifically sophisticated about the young bean’s finish, I still give him credit for hitting the target when he had approximately half the City team stationed between him and it.

3. Kudus

A brief congratulatory word too, for young Master Kudus, for reasons that it would be easy to overlook. Following his presentations against PSG and Burnely I burbled away with some satisfaction about the strength and skill he demonstrated whenever he strode forward.

While these facilities were once again on show intermittently yesterday, what really caught the AANP eye was Kudus’ very obvious eagerness to come bounding back and muck in whenever City advanced upon Porro in or around our own area. Who knew that a fellow as fond of the glamorous, attacking side to life as Kudus, would be quite so dedicated to the grubbier parts of the job?

And yet this was no perfunctory contribution on the part of Kudus. He did not simply amble back to the general vicinity and watch on with limited intent as Porro did the dirty work. Kudus veritably sprinted back to assist, on several occasions.

These are, of course, early days, and one waits to see how long this eagerness to please his new employers remains a defining characteristic, but by golly I gave an impressed whistle or two as I watched it unfold.

4. Vicario

Part of what made this quite such an impressive win, quite apart from the obvious elements of the opposition and venue, was the fact that this was not one of those bashes in which our lot hung on for dear life inside our own penalty area and survived a bit of an onslaught at the end. Far from it.

In fact, close the eyes and whizz through proceedings in your mind, and you’ll struggle to pick out more than three or four clear chances conceded. We almost gifted City a goal in the second half, when we gummed up one of those dreadful short goal-kick routines; and Haaland headed over from close range at the end of the first half; but aside from those I only remember two Vicario saves of note.

However, those two saves were of the highest order, and simply to gloss over them on the grounds that City created little else would be to do a disservice to our regular overseer of the rear.

For a start, both saves were made at 0-0 in the first half, at which point, had he failed to do his shot-stopping duties, the whole pattern of the game would have turned on its head. We may, of course, have concede one or both of these and still gone on to win in handsome fashion; but on the other hand, we may not have done so.

The first of those saves saw Vicario make the sagacious decision to depart his goal-line at a pretty nifty lick, and head out to the right corner of the 6-yard box, to do a spot of healthy smothering of an incoming shot from a narrow angle. It was the sort that, I suppose, one would have been mightily disappointed to have gummed up and allowed in, but nevertheless it needed saving and save it Vicario did.

The second was drizzled in a bit more glamour, that Marmoush character finding himself clean through and at a much more welcoming angle. Those who enjoy a flutter every now and then would presumably have taken one look and shoved their chips in on Marmoush, for the odds were heavily in his favour.

Vicario, however, sped from his line and then spread his frame like a champion – arms outstretched, legs splayed and frame upright. The collective effort of these body parts proved sufficient. Marmoush’s effort was repelled, quite possibly by the chest or neck of Vicario, and parity remained.

To stress, this was not one of those afternoons in which Vicario could be spotted hurling himself this way and that every five minutes to keep City at bay – but what he had to do he did most effectively, and if after a moment’s thought Our Glorious Leader saw fit to pat him on the back on the way down the tunnel, it would have been an act of congratulation with which I could only have concurred.

Sharing is daring:

25 replies on “Man City 0-2 Spurs: Four Tottenham Talking Points”

Good to see you back for the new term, AANP (- I confess I forgot to read you last week). These are dangerous days indeed for those of us of an incurably optimistic frame of mind; need to keep feet on ground, doncha know.
You could have written a mini-essay on any of the 11 or 15 players yesterday – so where on earth is there room for one of these high-priced fancy-dans that still feature in the transfer rumour mill? I mean, do we need a “play maker” – when a question was lobbed at TF, quoting Jurgen Klopp’s opinion that a high press obviated the need for one, our leader enthusiastically agreed. Any thoughts, AANP?

Hi Ed, welcome back! Agree that there were no shortage of takers for acclaim yesterday, and certainly a big fan of that high press. My personal view on a playmaker is a firm “Yes please!” Not least for those special occasions on which teams sit back with ten behind the ball, but also just for general play – I’ll always encourage chappies who can get us off our feet, beat two or three and make magic happen.

Only 2 PL games to judge but the thought occurs that TF picks the team and formation based on the opposition. Gray and Bergvall were enough to deal with Burnley at home. Upgrade and adapt with Paulie and Bents for City away.

Always much enjoy your posts, and fully concur with your comments. It will be impossible to keep up this standard of play, though, without further reinforcements, but we’re not holding our breath are we? And just one tiny correction: it’s Palhinha not Paulinha. Good to see it’s Kudus not Kudos. A little bugbear of mine, players’ names not being pronounced or spelled properly, Udogie (Oo-doggy) being a prime example of the former – drives me crazy!

Oh gosh, noted on Palinha – many thanks. (One of my other hats is as a commentator so I’m certainly attuned to pronunciation)

Agree to everything you’ve posted. Only one thing I would like to add on Vic. Please ask the goalkeeping coach to show Vic how to save penalties!

Thanks AANP. I read one commentator earlier saying the whole team playing well together. When was the last time that happened? The hunting in packs on the press reminded me of those halcyon Poch days. Kudos (or Kudus!) to the new gaffer who seems to include coaching in his repertoire. What a start. Typical Tottenham, of course, will lose to Bournemouth. Maybe Mr Frank can prove to be a change of fortune?

When they lost a tackle they tried again and won – can’t remember that happening for many years. Could be something happening here at last. Youngsters also maturing early following our injury woes last seasoning. Just two matches so the stars aligning maybe a too early call but I pray 🙂

You have been calling for a Palhinha type for a couple of seasons now… and have been proved right. Could it be that TFrank is an avid reader of your missives? I hope so, because you deliver a lot of good sense in amongst the humour. As for that performance – I reckon I shall be down from the ceiling come Tuesday

I am also in agreement with nearly everything posted. The question of bringing in reinforcements is a sticky one. But I trust Thomas Frank to manage any new additions as well as he is managing the current squad. We did play so well on Saturday – the back 5 were excellent – it’s been reported that the defenders practice blocking shots in training and my word it is paying off. I am also refusing to get too excited – not through my Spursiness (Vertigo) but because Man City played very poorly.
Back to new additions I do think we need another forward – potentially left-footed winger – as usual Brennan Johnson was the target of the small amount of displeasure I felt on Saturday. He took his goal well – as he should – but I think that was his only contribution? I noted him pulling out of a 50:50 midway between the 6-yard line and the edge of the box, when a bit of additional effort and bravery may have resulted in getting him past the last defender or getting upended for a pen. I also read a reported comment from BJ – when he was asked about any changes in training compared to last season and he replied “not much, more work on set pieces” was my precis and if true it shows that BJ is not really paying attention.

BJ is weird isn’t he? Nothing of note except goals. Which in itself is a weird observation. Do you keep him, and live with the frustration, or drop him and forego the goals? I also counsel against overexcitement at this stage but I think WE were the reason City played badly. Our tactics put them off their game. It’s no coincidence, it was the same story with PSG. The difference is Frank saw how we folded against the French lot, and worked on that problem. If we succeed in turning over Bournemouth I may start to believe (setting myself up for the fall).

ManC game was an opportunity for some excellent bedding in of our newfound stoutness. Our last 3 preseason and super cup games were against strong teams . All needed a stout defensive application.

TFrank has alluded that he found a group of players who have a strong bond and apply themselves intensely to defending.

I think that was the last stamp of our Aussie on this team (those last 5 matches to the trophy seem to have put a new steel in them, plus a little sprinkling of the dark arts-time wasting drama etc ably let by Romero and Richy)

An excellent, well coached display. The bench told a story though, full of teenagers and the odd stalwart like Davies. We can bring someone on to do a job but that’s it (Bergvall being the exception). That’s going to become more obvious as we start playing two games a week. A left winger, AM and CB of decent quality required if we’re going to trouble the top 5. COYS!

Hi AANP, I can’t help asking but is everything okay with you? It’s just so unusual for you to miss a match and we’re missing your insights and prose greatly.

Hi Mr B, many thanks for your concern, and apologies for being incommunicado for so long – yes there’s quite a lot going on at my end unfortunately, so having to prioritise my time. Hope to be back at the desk and scribbling away again imminently!

Likewise with MichaelB, hope everything works out for you. Need you back, with your Palhinha spelling mastered, especially after tonight’s leveller.

Leave a Reply to Colin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.