Categories
Spurs match reports

PSG 2-2 Spurs: Six Tottenham Talking Points

1. Formation

Trophy-winners though we might these days be, AANP was still steeped to the gills in the old, familiar dread before kick-off, and I’m not sure the teamsheet did much to soothe the frayed nerves.

Our newest Glorious Leader had unveiled what appeared on first glance to be a goalkeeper and eight defensive sorts for this one, and while one tries of course to be reasonable about these things, I must confess to reacting with a widening of the eyes, a murmured “What the dickens..?” and a few wildly quizzical looks.

More fool AANP. Fast forward 90 or so minutes and the 3-5-2 turned out to be a tactical masterpiece. “Balance” was the word I heard bandied on the telly-box, and while those commentary sorts can spout all manner of gibberish when they’ve got a mic thrust in front of them, on this occasion the chappie in question had stumbled upon the mot juste.

With a back-three in situ, one never really felt that our lot were outnumbered and straining every sinew to put out fires at the back. Gone was that sense of desperate last-ditch life-saving, and the frantic haphazard retreats that had become a bit of a hallmark in recent years.  

With this 3-5-2, we were, defensively a different beast. Which is to say that we were a beast with a few more bodies at the back. If, say, a Danso were turned and outpaced, a Romero could be relied upon to appear stage left and uproot a tree or two in clearing the danger. Should Doue or whomever start unfurling stepovers on the right, the reassuring sight of at least two in lilywhite would materialise to suffocate him.

PSG had it in them to one-touch our lot to death – and in such circumstances one accepts with a gracious shrug that that’s the way of things – but our lot were not be found wanting for numbers at the back, and this in itself was rather reassuring.

And in fact, much the same could be said of the midfield, where a triumvirate was deployed to similarly successful effect. Now Paulinha, ironically enough for a laddie who appears to AANP to be precisely what the doctor ordered, appears pretty desperately undercooked at present. Not his fault, he having barely laced a boot over the last 12 months by all accounts, and to repeat, I see him in time metamorphosing into an absolute pitbull in front of our defence.

Last night, however, the chap did appear to wheeze and puff his way through things somewhat. But lo, once again the use of a three-man construction came to our rescue, for that midfield also featured Messrs Sarr and Bentancur, both of whom came across as specimens at their absolute physical peak. (As an aside, it warmed the heart to observe Bentancur strutting about with fitness levels off the charts, following the near constant stream of batterings and bruises he’s collected over the past two years).

The presence of Sarr and Bentancur, essentially doing all the running so that Paulinha didn’t have to, meant that in midfield as in defence, we rarely looked outnumbered, and frequently showed sufficient appetite to snaffle possession from PSG and dance off over halfway.

Of course, any 3-5-2 lives and dies on the quality of its wing-backs, and here we really are blessed. One can only imagine the disbelieving glee with which Porro would have rubbed his eyes in the changing room beforehand when informed of his role. After two years of inverting and drifting infield, he didn’t need asking twice to bomb up the flank, and within about 30 seconds of kick-off could be spotted patrolling the corner of the PSG area with a glint in his eye.

Both he and Spence out on the other side gave fair indication of having not only received the memo, but taken to heart its contents, adopting the principles of top-notch wing-backery as their mantra for 90 minutes. The pair managed to tick boxes in both directions – and it was little surprise that when they (along with everyone else) ran out of steam in the final 20 or so, and they stopped advancing up the pitch, segueing from wing-backs to deep full-backs, our strategy rather fell apart at the seams.

So the 3-5-2 received a big fat tick at AANP Towers. I’m not sure that the same level of caution will be required for the next meeting with Tamworth – or even Burnley at home – but for a first innings of the season, against probably the best team in the world, and with a side shorn of its key attacking pipkins, 3-5-2 turned out to be just the ticket.

2. Richarlison

In rattling through the roll of honour of those who made the 3-5-2 work it is only right that I add to the Hall of Fame young Richarlison. For someone long established in the AANP rankings as the least technically gifted Brazilian to have kicked a ball, he delivered one heck of a tap-dance.

Drinking in this performance with some astonishment, I was reminded of a chappie I knew at the old almer mater, who one term returned after the summer hols with a new blonde haircut, a complete change in attire and announcing himself to the fairer sex as “Surfy”. In short, the curious fish had for some reason reinvented himself, and so it seemed with Richarlison last night.

Gone was the moody wretch possessed of two left feet and half-hearted chasing of lost causes, to be replaced sharpness of touch and a stirring line in winning possession on or around halfway.

One of the fellow’s first touches of the ball was a first-time effort from a good 20 yards out, by which this absolute interloper seemed to be saying “Forget what you thought you knew, for I am now Richarlison, doer of the impossible (or at least attempter of the improbable”).

With Kudus happy to buzz around alongside him, it all made for a most useful apex to the 3-5-2.

I suppose the question now is whether the transformation can last. That self-styled ‘Surfy’ chap from university binned the new image after a few weeks, so one treats these episodes with some caution; and moreover, if Solanke is fully fit – and the indications are he’s on course for it – then a pretty clear hierarchy emerges.

So call me a cynic, but given that last night’s shindig will have been watched by a near global audience with little better to do, I’m inclined to suggest that this is the optimum time to slap a hefty price-tag on R9 and shove him into the arms of the highest bidder.

3. Kudus

AANP is not one of that breed who spends his leisure hours studying footage of West Ham United, and as such I couldn’t have told you too much about Mohammed Kudus beyond his Fantasy League stats before he pitched up at N17. But by golly, if last night taught me anything it was that here was a fellow who knew how to make a first impression.

Specifically, that first impression seemed to consist of displaying the strength of about a dozen oxen. Of course, it is a prerequisite for the modern-day footballer to display a physique like one of those sculpted marble statues of the Greek gods, but even allowing for that I would not have cast the eye upon Kudus and immediately placed him as a 12-round heavyweight.

And yet, in glorious technicolour last night we were treated to the sight of a PSG sort clambering all over Kudus and pretty much bouncing off him, then to be joined by a second PSG sort, and sometimes even a third – but with their combined mights having minimal impact upon the chap.

Given his nomination for Strongest Man Alive one would have understood if, upon then emerging from the ruck with the ball at his feet, Kudus then displayed the touch of a malcoordinated donkey – but it turns out that on top of everything else he also skips about the place like a lissom cage footballer, turning his opposing full-backs inside out and painting pretty patterns with his feet.

I suppose if one were to be hyper-critical one might suggest that he could put in a few more hours in the back garden working on his weaker foot, but that’s one for another day. It’s unsurprising that in just about every pre-season game so far the primary tactic has been “Give It To Kudus” because in just about any circumstance he can not only shield the ball to afford everyone else a puff of the cheeks, but he’ll also then embark on one of those mazy ones and create a spot of mischief.

4. Sarr

With Kudus deployed yesterday in a role that was nominally supporting striker, but often morphed into right winger, young Sarr was accordingly re-jigged into a slightly more traditional midfield role. In case you missed the last few weeks, he has spent much of pre-season operating behind the front man, in the ‘Number 10’ role. Not one I’d have pencilled him in for, I must admit, but our new Head Honcho seems to think that his run-and-chase routine has value up the top of the pitch, so one sees the logic.

Anyway, back to last night, and Sarr’s remit had decidedly less glitz and glamour. “Mop up the loose ends”, was about the gist of it. And frankly, if he had reacted to this instruction with a darkening of the brow and a moody stare, one would have had a degree of sympathy. Chasing shadows against a team that has dished out a 5-0 tonking in the Champions League final of all games, is hardly the stuff of dreams.

Sarr, however, responded to the call like an absolute champion. If there were a loose ball to be seen just about anywhere inside our own half, he was onto it with the alacrity of one of those sizeable wild cats in the nature programmes leaping onto its prey.

It made sense, as he’s always been one of those beans so energetic that one feels rather exhausted just watching him, but his presence added a most welcome layer of security at the back as well as in midfield. Sarr regularly hurtled across the penalty area to stick out a well-timed limb if PSG threatened to find a yard of space, and by the time he was withdrawn I was pretty clear in my mind that there stood the game’s outstanding performer.

5. Spence

On the topic of outstanding performers, however, an honourable mention to young Spence. It remains most perplexing to me that this chap, ordained by nature as right-footed, should so regularly appear vastly more accomplished as a left-back than as right-back, but nature does occasionally throw up these quirks I suppose.

And last night, Spence rather hammered home the point that left wing-back is the life for him. Going forward he was a nuisance, providing an attacking outlet all the way into the PSG area, and as such doing a fair bit to nullify the threat of Hakimi.

Had this impressive front-foot display been to the detriment of his defending we might well have exchanged knowing looks and clicked the tongue a bit – but as it happened, he covered all of his defensive duties in watchful manner throughout.

It was rather a shame that the PSG equaliser emanated from a cross from his side, because for most of the game Spence had his defensive area under lock and key. Udogie will presumably consider himself the first choice in the role, but Spence comes across as a chap who clearly knows his onions.

6. Defeat

Having feared a hammering (particularly in the wake of the Bayern debacle) I was most pleasantly surprised at the general to-ing and fro-ing on offer last night. PSG were seemingly not at the peak of their powers, but our lot did not seem inclined to pause and debate this, and instead just got on with matters. A dashed good fist they made of things too.

However, while no points were lost, all manner of positives were snaffled and the consensus was that we deserved a little better, I reserved the right to head for the exits with a spot of chuntering on my lips.

The bone of contention was that our lot need to find ways to win shiny pots. We did it in Bilbao, and I was pretty miffed that we failed to do it last night. The whole attitude of puffing out the chest and saying we were jolly good sports is not enough. It grates. Our lot should not be content with making it to finals, and from 2-0 up after 85 minutes we ought to have seen the thing through. There was a trophy of sorts on offer, and a cracking opportunity to turn that sort of thing into a habit.

Sharing is daring:

25 replies on “PSG 2-2 Spurs: Six Tottenham Talking Points”

Welcome back AANP, I too thought they played a cracking match and deserved a result. We’ve often talked about what score and how many minutes left would make you feel comfortable enough to put down your whisky bottle, rest back, cross your arms and legs and adopt a contented look. I was definitely at that point after 70 mins only to then have to revert back to putting my hands over my face and peaking through my fingers.

A few more decent players needed yet but Levy is once again leaving it until it’s too late.

COYS

Welcome back to AANP Towers Mr B! Although I can’t say I share your insouciance at a mere 2-goal lead after 70 mins! Four as a minimum! Alas, agree on Levy and his exasperating timing though.

Nice to see you again Mr. AANP. My main takeaway from last night was just how refreshing the game was for my eyes and head, it was common sense (and good) football and I think we have to go back to Poch for the last time we saw it! Some quick thoughts:

We actually looked like we had practiced dead ball situations, every time we had one, it looked dangerous. Defending the few we had to, no worries, nothing to see here. When was the last time we could feel that way?

How about a coach who is actually coaching?!??! Frank is on the sidelines up and down, yelling instructions, talking to his assistants, he is in the game!

The athleticism of our squad, that starting 11 looked like something out of a video game. They can all run (maybe exception being Richarlison) and just look like natural athletes.

Who was that guy flying around in midfield? He wears Bentancur’s # but I had to keep rubbing the eyes to ensure it was actually him!

Spence, what a game, defensively just about snuffed everything out and the pace, wow, he caught some real flyers more then a few times.

All that said, with 10 minutes remaining and PSG tightening the screws, that all too familiar feeling of dread was back. A wide open shot from the top of the box, seen that one before. I have sympathy for Spence on the cross, I mean he can’t be expected to block every single one but my question was; where are the CBs? I think Danso was there trying to mark two men flying into the 6 yard box. Romero, where are you?

If I’m going to quibble, I think Frank still had a little more on the bench and should have gone to it earlier, its preseason, guys have been running their butts off, get some help in there!

All said, I was so relieved when they hired Frank, he is everything I like in a manager and we are going to get good, solid, commonsense football for the season. Does that mean top 4? Probably not yet but we should be in the European discussion.

Must temper my optimism, *must* temper my optimism… but yep, the energy our lot showed (until the engines collectively sputtered and gave up) was mightily encouraging. And agree on the equaliser, there were three centre-backs, dash it, at least one of them should have been on their toes.

Welcome back chief quilt(er).

I think TFrank will do great stuff at Spurs but I do wish Biss had been suspended for the Burnley game instead of the PSG one-coming in the last 20minutes. None of our DMs are as good as he is defensively.
He is a big game player.

If all he can do is to give top performance which help us get our hands on trophies, I can live with that
(Exhibit: the last five matches to Bilbao glory)

I can only concur with your previous correspondents in welcoming you back, AANP.

After a week of depression following the Munich mauling there was much to like v PSG. Danso,s long throws. Solanke back again. Solid defending. Can’t help thinking the shoot out would have turned out better with Kane and Son though.

However, a little nervous about the Burnley game – did Wednesdays match take too much out of us? As ever, hope over expectation!

Howe

What ho Mr Sealy! Indeed, the Weds-Saturday energy level concern has crossed my mind too. Fingers crossed…

Good day Sir. I believe in fairy tales. Not fairy tails, as they don’t exist. However, we now have the prosepct of playing more like a team, and not losing anything like last term when we were 11 chickens running around after a fox. Come the end of the book, we may have a happy ending

It’s ridiculous that we’re about to start the new season and we’re still looking to sign three players or so.

They should have been signed sealed and delivered weeks ago. Not only would it have given the new players time to settle, but we might have just had enough to actually hold out the final stages of the game on Wednesday night, and won us another trophy. Daniel Levy’s tactics of driving down a price definitely affects the team and our ability to get deals done. In fact we have a few chairman now who refuse to deal with Levy at all. You can’t alienate other teams when it comes to signing players, there are only so many teams to deal with. The way this window has gone so far, it wouldn’t surprise me, if we only signed one player, if at all.

Levy, Lewis, and ENIC OUT

Oh god.. Not Borg.. Year after year the same old miserable negative drivel.. I had hoped he has passed on but here he is in his full moaning git miserable glory.. Go and get a life Borg. ??

Would’ve been nice to have had the transfers wrapped up a month back, but if we swing both Eze I’ll graciously accept the delay.

Indeed, great to have you back, AANP and thank you for applying needed balm to my somewhat singed football (that is to say Spurs) ego after Bayern and Wednesday night.
To have nine fingers on a second trophy in 3 months only to see it slither away into the hands of the other lot, Euro top dogs of exceptional pedigree though they are, was a new variant of blows to the old solar p.
However, as you skilfully point out, there were many positives to take from the encounter.
I also make the following suggestion:
Would triumph four days ago have led to some false expectations, yet again?
What we want to see v Burnley, is the same level of organisation and commitment we showed v PSG (hopefully for 95 minutes, this time!) to help to begin to lay the ghost of last year’s awful league season
Sporting another gleaming pot before the match had all the hallmarks of an invitation to display the all too familiar hubris we seemingly love to court.
Let the huge disappointment of Wednesday evening spur us on to the heights again, I say!

Hello Mr D! Yes, I take your point on expectations. Would still have preferred us to turn winning Finals into a habit, but the reality check has its value.

Lewis has been out a while. Daniel Levy is widely regarded as the most successful CEO at any EPL club – many clubs especially Man Utd I guess, would love to have had him in charge. Listening to Levy in his interview with G Neville made even prouder than I normally am to have supported our Club for 65 years. I have high hopes as usual for the season and I really wish that the commentary on this excellent blog stuck to on-field matters where they can at least see sufficient activity to voice an opinion.

Hello again Colin. You’ll certainly get your wish from me, not one for opining on the off-pitch stuff, don’t really understand most of it in truth. Quite happy to drink in the 90 minutes, scribble my tuppence worth and be done! I’ll go as far as to cheer a new signing (or curse when they slip through our fingers), but beyond that it’s a shrug of the shoulders, and focus on the pitch.

Good to have you back. I started watching with extreme trepidation, by half time I was full of joy, rubbing my eyes in disbelief, on 60 I started getting twitchy, by full time I was disappointed. That’s Spurs for ya. Plus ca change and all that. In all seriousness, Frank clearly knows his onions. What he can do with this squad (or a hopefully to be improved version of it) remains to be seen, but I am now looking forward to the new era. Expectations have to be managed, regimes have to bed in, patience has to be exercised, but last night brought me hope. PS, I know it is the literal truth, but I hate reading about our ‘defeat’ at the hands of PSG. To my mind it was a draw, with the prize eventually awarded to the winner of the Post Match lottery.

Hello again Todspur. And I like your thinking on the concept of the draw – doesn’t really suit the tabloids and whatnot, but yep, the match finished level. Felt like a defeat mind, even before the pens. I do share your hope though!

Yeah Levy, Lewis, and ENIC OUT, Glazers or suchlike in.
A leveraged buy out leaving us servicing approx 4bn debt is definitely the way to go….

I’ve got to agree about how happy I was to see Danso’s long throws – he kept that hidden last season (although different position I guess). We have now got ourselves extra corners in the game 🙂

Mr. AANP, would you now sell R9 after that brace yesterday? And who’s this “Paulinho?” — Joao Palhinha is our #6, here to teach the tricks to young Gray, perhaps. PS Welcome back.

Ha, I had quite the debate with a fellow Spurs-supporter about the merits of Paulinha vs the ills of Paulinho, took my eye off the ball there. As for the R9 question – as per m y latest post, I’m trying to fathom whether this equates to two freak occurrences or an exciting rebirth.

Leave a Reply to Sealy1946 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.