AANP’s new book ‘All Action No Plot: Postecoglou’s First Season’, is out now for just £7.99 from Amazon (ebook from £6.99)
1. Romero
I’ve heard it said that a picture is worth a thousand words, and if you’d caught sight of AANP watching on as yesterday’s mess unwrapped itself, the first six of those thousand might well have been, “Golly, there’s an unamused soul, what?”
However, while it’s true enough that, taken as a whole, the latest fiasco rather hollowed out the insides, I did draw a spot of comfort from a pretty unusual source. If you’ve dipped into these pages before you may be aware that while clucking and cooing over the returning VDV like a doting mother over a favoured child, AANP regards Cristian Romero with decidedly less warmth. Those bursts forward to lunge wildly at ball, player and anything else in sight are a dash too maniacal for my conservative tastes in defending; and his tendency to blot from his consciousness the whole business of monitoring opposing forwards sneaking in at the back post is pretty maddening stuff.
Safe to say that the fellow does not feature too highly on the roster of feted heroes at AANP Towers. If the club decide that there’s a quick buck to be made from pawning off the chap in the summer – and let’s face it, Grandmaster Levy can scent a quick b. from a mile off – then they’ll have my blessing.
Given all this back-story, you may shoot a pretty suspicious glance when I tell you that by the time he was withdrawn in one of those heavily choreographed moves, on the hour, I was pretty firmly of the opinion that Romero had been our star performer.
Admittedly there might be an embarrassed cough from the stalls at this point, as someone tactfully points out that the place was hardly flooded with contenders for that particular rosette. It would be a fair point. The bar for star performers was low. Bergvall injected his usual youthful vim; Sonny too, oddly enough, seemed to conduct himself with a determination to leave an imprint; and young Tel gave evidence that he’s better fitted to life as a flank-based whippet than a centrally-positioned beast of brawn and muscle. However, Son and Bergvall only entered the fray at half-time, and two useful gambols from Tel did not a match-winning performance make.
No, it was Romero who seemed to catch the eye. Not so much cream rising to the top, as the only packet of milk in the batch that had yet to curdle, he at least did all that centre-back should do and with a few extras thrown in.
He may have erred once or twice, but not so badly that one would notice, and he generally he did a decent job of blocking incoming crosses, and keeping his particular quarters under lock and key.
Moverover, while I’ve lamented pretty regularly that tendency to fly off on personal vendettas of ill-judged aggression on halfway, yesterday he actually judged them pretty well. Credit where due. Every time Romero was struck by the urge to leave the back-four behind and upend a Fulham player higher up the pitch, a Fulham player would indeed end up pleasingly splayed across the turf, and apparently within the regulations of the game.
Romero also seemed to have his radar well set when it came to picking forward passes. This made a welcome change from the endless cycle of fairly empty sideways passing that tends to infect our lot for long periods each week. On a few occasions Romero directed a pretty useful pass through the midfield, bypassing various Fulham bobbies in one fell swoop.
All of which was useful enough, but to repeat, most importantly he ticked the basic defensive boxes, and this was pretty welcome stuff.
2. Ben Davies
By contrast, Ben Davies seemed not to know what sport he was playing. To be outmuscled, as he was for the second goal, by, of all people, Ryan Sessegnon – a poor sap whose frame seems comprised of biscuits held together by elastic bands – is a pretty damning indictment of one’s capacity for the physical battle.
And yet, having initially observed a straightforwardly bouncing ball with the sort of horror normally reserved for a dropping atomic bomb, Davies managed first to fail to clear it, then allow to Sessegnon to hold him at arm’s length and toss him this way and that like a ragdoll, before finally watching on with a pretty depressing impotence as Sessegnon picked out the top corner of all things.
Nor was this the extent of Davies’ ignominy. That first goal from Fulham, while owing much to the misjudgement of Odobert on the right, and the half-hearted flapping of various cast members inside the penalty area, had at its genesis another Ben Davies moment – albeit rather more excusable – when in attempting to win a header from a goal-kick he was resoundingly bested in the air by that Muniz chap.
On top of which, it’s easy to forget that back in the first half, a period one might easily expunge from the memory on account of nothing of note happening at all between its first and last whistles, Ben Davies contrived to gift Fulham the only real chance of the half.
To fill in the loose plot, such as it was, a Fulham sort aimlessly chipped a pass into the area just after the half-hour mark, with not a teammate in sight. Now here, in Davies’ defence, he might reasonably have expected a guttural roar from his goalkeeper, giving clear instruction. Whether or not such vocalisation was forthcoming I couldn’t say.
What was beyond doubt was that at this point, and under no pressure, Davies took to the edge of the six-yard box and rearranged his limbs into what appeared a mid-air yoga pose, arms pointing in one direction, legs in another and overall balance pretty seriously lacking. This done, and still airborne, Davies then attempted an ungainly hack at the ball.
One could have advised him by this point that the plan was stinker. No good could come of it. He’d have been infinitely better off in every conceivable respect if he’d just given up the thing – as everyone else in the area had done – and let the ball drift the necessary yard or so into the arms of Vicario.
He didn’t however, and instead made contact with the ball, succeeding only in presenting it neatly into the path of Castagne, while Davies himself concluded his input by sprawling along the ground.
As mentioned, the sorry affair may well have been resolved by Vicario laying claim to the thing; but having made up his mind to take action, Davies’ pickling of it may have been disastrous. As it turned out, there was plenty of time for disaster at the death, with the Sessegnon goal.
I suppose everyone has a bad day now and then, but I struggle to remember Archie Gray, for example, making quite as many ghastly – and costly – errors at centre-back.
3. Broader Problems
There are, of course, more pressing concerns at play than an off-day from our possibly sixth-choice centre-back. The lack of urgency in possession (particularly in the first half), lack of precision in simple passes, complete disappearance of an effective high-press and general failure to give two hoots about winning back possession in midfield all struck me as indicative of a team whose motion-going-through antics were pretty polished.
I recall back in the mists of August or perhaps September, our heroes drew with Leicester and lost to Newcastle, on both occasions have given these sides a bit of a leathering. On those occasions I shrugged the forgiving shrug. Play peak Angeball and create 20 or so chances, ran the theory, and the goods will more often than not be delivered.
The forgiving shrug was shrugged once more over the winter months, as the squad was decimated and staggered their way through games. Extenuating circs, and so forth.
Yesterday, however, one rather struggled to find reasons to explain away the dirge. Individual players not putting their heart and soul into matters is a tough one at which to aim the forgiving shrug. One appreciates that all eggs are now neatly arranged in the Europa basket, but it undoubtedly lies upon Our Glorious Leader to motivate the players for such events as ‘Fulham (away)’, even when there is little to be gained in the remaining league games. An uptick in performance will be needed after the international jollies.
20 replies on “Fulham 2-0 Spurs: Three Tottenham Talking Points”
Thanks for that AANP. A game of absolutely no consequence, nor action. Just two costly defensive mistakes. Could have been power-hosing the patio.
However, reading your piece, something occurred to me. Since the departure of dear old Pierre-E H. we have all been moaning about the lack of a defensive midfield player. Also, yesterday apart, we have similarly been moaning about Cuti’s preponderance for the suicidal. How’s about moving him up in front of the back two (three or four?) in such a role. As you say he does play those forward passes cutting through the opponents midfield usually bypassing a couple of the opposition (similar to what Adam Wharton does at Palace). Anyway, just a thought.
Audere est facere
I quite like the idea, frankly. It will never happen, but I do like the concept. All a bit weak and floppy in midfield at present (and for the last 40-odd years).
Genius!
Well, that was all pretty restrained, AANP. I suppose we’ve all got a bit used to this shrugging routine. After all, what do you expect after seven changes from the other evening? But hang on a minute, we’ve got a couple of weeks of the England qualifiers snoozefest coming up – we really don’t have to fine-tune Romero’s fitness for the benefit of Argentina, Maddison is raring to go again, ditto Bergvall – what’s it all about, Ange? We could even win the bally Europa but AP’s credibility has been so eroded that I think he’d still be on his way in the summer.
I sort of share your thinking on Romero – take the dosh from Real Madrid and pass it over to Crystal Palace for the young God-botherer at centre-back. But I do like watching Romero, who contributes so much to the essential theatre of it all. The kind of Argie who got under Sir Alf’s skin all those years ago!
Anyway, all water under the bridge, bring on Eintracht Frankfurt.
Did hear Ange muttering about giving minutes to them all, to get them up to speed – presumably for the rotation that happens before and after the Frankfurt games – so maybe that was the thinking? Depressing that it already has an end of term feel.
They’ve stopped Ange-ball and are closer to Conte-ball – nothing exciting in the press anymore as they can’t string together passes or a shot. Even our rising hero Djed gave up the ghost and I was shouting at him to move a bit faster at my TV screen.
Sadly, there’s probably not a manager alive that could make a difference (although Harry Redknapp is keen as always).
AANP is an island of literary excellence in a sea of Internet slop. Win or lose I look forward with great anticipation to your post game analysis. As for this particular post, terrific as always, though I felt you were a bit tough on poor Ben Davies who, year in and year out seems to be dedicated to the cause…no matter how many minutes he gets.
Keep up the good work.
Hopefully this year out
I’m pretty much done with Ange now after showing patient support. His team selection is unfathomable – the only positive was not having Werner on the bench. Mikey Moore played an hour for the U-21’s, scored and generally looked head & shoulders above the rest. We need a manager & coaching staff who can nurture the exceptional talent we have in the current academy.
Sunday was incredibly disappointing. I certainly didn’t go into the game with any real hope or expectation after Fulham had the whole week to prepare, while we had an intense game two and a half days earlier, with players that would obviously need to be taken out of the firing line due to risk of re-injury.
However, the line up he picked left us with no creativity whatsoever. It looked like a team that was there to contain, with the hope of bringing on the creative players later on in the game to win it for us, which is not Ange-ball at all. But, as it turned out, it sort of worked. We offered absolutely nothing going forwards, but we weren’t really troubled defensively either, apart from a poor Davies clearance that fell straight to their player who scuffed an easy shot to Vicario. Romero was looking more his old self, both in his passing and the lunges he makes with reckless abandon, and Davies looked comfortable alongside him, offering left-sided balance. Tel looked a bit brighter playing off the left, which is hopefully a sign of better things to come, and the game was petering out.
That doesn’t for a second mean that we played well, because we really didn’t. The midfield was shocking, but my biggest gripe was with Brennan Johnson. I hate scapegoating players, and will always look to give them the benefit of the doubt, but I won’t accept laziness, and this guy is as lazy as they come. The only time he shows any urgency is when he gets in at the back post for a tap in. When the ball is on the right and it’s his turn to provide, he offers absolutely nothing. There was one cross from Tel that was slightly overhit, but still in play, and he should have sprinted it down to keep the attack going, and he just sauntered over and almost let it go out of play, and all momentum was lost. Half-hearted challenges, pretend jumps to try to win headers, never making runs or angles to make himself available, and basically hiding and being a passenger while he’s on the pitch, effectively leaving us with ten men. It’s no surprise that he was hooked at half time. With that midfield we needed our wide men to create, and he never creates anything.
Speaking of that midfield, it is clear that Bissouma and now possibly Bentancur need to be moved on in the summer. Neither sense danger and are press resistant enough to be a 6, and neither have the dynamism or passing ability to go box to box as an 8. The jury is still out on Gray as it was his first ever start in midfield for us, and it was alongside those two, who did him no favours, but he was probably the best of the 3, although the bar was incredibly low. At the moment, the best 6 we have and the best 8 we have are one and the same… Bergvall. Sarr, when on form, is an 8, and Maddison is our only 10. I honestly don’t see Kulu as a 10 as he’s so wasteful and makes so many bad decisions when in possession, and he also commits too many stupid fouls, but him and Odobert should be our RW options, and Johnson should be moved on in the summer, despite being our top scorer. Odobert got 2 goals on Thursday playing off the right, and actually contributed to the performance, which is something Johnson never does, so hopefully he’ll take that spot as he builds up his fitness.
Cardoso and Wharton in the summer? We desperately need better options in the middle of the park.
We did look livelier after the substitutions, but apart from a couple of Solanke headers and a left-footed shot we didn’t create that much, and nothing that was clear cut. But as he decided not to risk Van der Ven, we ended up with our 5th and 6th choice centre backs in Davies and Gray, and they are just not at PL level when playing together. Spence, for all his amazing attributes, has been caught ballwatching a few times recently, and certainly didn’t do Davies any favours for Sessegnon’s goal (of course!) as he just watched him struggle and lose his man, and the first goal was a calamity of errors after Odobert decided to take on 3 players as there was no viable pass.
So, once again, incredibly disappointing. That’s 15 PL losses now, which is absolutely disgraceful. It has been an awful season, with Bergvall, Spence and Solanke being the only silver linings, but hopefully we can get all our best players fully fit at the right time, cut out the stupid mistakes, and go and win the Europa League. If we don’t, there is absolutely no justification for sticking with this manager, and I imagine that plenty will want him gone even if we do win it. And if we do, I guess it will go down as a successful season, even though it’s been the most depressing and uninspiring season I can remember.
I usually hate the international break. Not this time. I can get through a weekend without an inevitable Premier League defeat.
Scintillating as usual Mr (Ms?) Pricey, but I deeply disagree with you on Kulu. He is wasteful, yes, but that is only because he dares to do the amazing. And my word does that bring some juicy fruit with decent consistency. As AANP and I have consistently noted, Madders has the inclination to place the burden of finding the ultimate killer pass on his shoulders every time he gets the ball, which 95 percent of the time makes him hold on to the ball a bit too long, suck out the life from the attack, and usually ends up with him passing sideways eventually. None of that from Kulu through the middle. I’d rather a creator who contributes 10 half chances every game than one who contributes 1 big chance and noth’g else.
It’s Mr… or Darren if you prefer.
I’m not putting Kulu down. I’m a fan, but I just don’t see him as a 10. An 8 maybe, as he’s a great ball carrier when he’s fully fit, but I don’t think he’s cutesy enough to break down a low block from the middle of the park, whereas he may be able to curl in a dangerous ball while cutting in from the right. His best position is an inside forward off the right with an overlapping full back, and if him and Son had overlapping full backs as decoys, allowing them to cut inside and shoot or whip in a dangerous ball, or slip the full back in round the back, we would create so many more chances.
Maddison has two main problems at Spurs. The first is that he isn’t fit enough to play two games a week in this system. He has really shone when he’s made runs into the box, and Porro or Romero are both capable of dinking a ball over the top, but he can’t maintain those fitness levels consistently.
The second is that Son is the only player on his wavelength, and vice versa. When Maddison doesn’t play, Son looks all lost and forlorn, stuck on the touchline with an inverted left back in front of him and nobody to link up with to get him infield where he’s dangerous. And when Son doesn’t play, Maddison is usually ineffective as there’s nobody to play intricate football with, which is usually required to overcome a low-block defence. We need better footballers in wide areas to get more out of Maddison. Ones that make runs inside or outside the full back, especially once we break the opponent’s press. Son isn’t as quick as he once was, and Johnson is quick but doesn’t make the runs unless there’s a tap in for him. Werner is actually the best in that area, but is too wasteful. Hopefully Mikey Moore and Odobert fulfil their potential, and maybe Yang, but we need to replace Johnson and Werner with more proven quality. Add a top number 6 that is press resistant and eats up the ground alongside Bergvall and Maddison and we will have a real team, for as long as they stay fit anyway!
That Son-Maddison wavelengths point is one over which I’ll cast the beady eye going forward
Watch our goals away at Southampton…
There are no other goals we score like that unless those two are involved.
Son misses playing off Kane terribly (You can see it… he hasn’t told me personally!) They were almost telepathic. Maddison is the only one who comes close from a wavelength perspective, although he is obviously a completely different player in a completely different position, but he does gravitate to the left, which is where they link up.
At times i’ve been critical of Maddison but his pure vision and execution of short range passes is pretty much as good as it gets. the fact he can only play 60 minutes a week is a huge probem
I still have a naive hankering to play the kids. Jamie Donley will be our best number 10 option – if given the chance – maybe exposure with Northern Ireland will support his case. If Vuscovic impresses in the pre-season then the decision to cash in Cuti could be made more easily.
Oddly, last summer was mostly spent clearing out loads of dead wood and I was left feeling it was very successful. It feels inconceivable that just a year later we’re going to need to rinse and repeat.
Bissouma, Son, Bencantur, Gill (serious injury on loan), Johnson, Romero, Davies, Werner, maybe Maddison – the list seems endless based on our form throughout the season. We’ll most likely replace them with more dead wood.
A couple of observations. Firstly there has been a tendency to cut AP some slack because of all the long term injuries. Rarely do we hear anyone speculate that many or even most of those injuries are due to the physical demands placed on players by his extreme high line. At the very beginning of the season a number of former top level players warned that the requirement for defenders to frequently sprint from high up the pitch to counter fast breaks would likely result in a procession of serious ligament injuries, with MVDV being postulated as the most likely victim. Originally I thought this all sounded a tad dramatic but now their fears have been more than justified, particularly since recently released statistics have shown that Spurs players average more long distance sprints in a game than those of any other Premiership team. This having been said the injury issue seems less like a valid excuse and more like a self inflicted wound.
My second observation is that while many have made a virtue of AP sticking to all out attack no matter what the circumstances nobody seems to have questioned whether this is not really a matter of principle but more a case of he doesn’t have the tactical nous to do anything else. A glaring example of why could may be the case came during the 6 – 3 humiliation by Liverpool when Lee Dixon and Graeme Le Saux, who were providing color commentary in the USA, expressed amazement that AP was doing nothing to prevent the Spurs midfield being out numbered and overrun as a result of having to cover for wingbacks that had been lured upfield and left stranded. Since then both Dixon and Le Saux have repeatedly stated that the only in game changes AP seems to be capable of making are player substitutions rather than tactical tweaks. The bottom line is that AP is seriously overmatched by the majority of his Premiership peers who took just 10 games to get over the surprise of his “revolutionary” approach and come up with ways to exploit the now obvious weaknesses. The Emporer has no clothes folks!
Of course the big concern now is that we only ended up with AP in the first place because any manager worth his salt did not want to work for Levy. We can only hope that the frightening thought of possibly owning the best stadium in the Championship may have finally convinced our beloved Chairman that he needs to stick to the business side of things and leave footballing matters, particularly transfers, to those who are responsible for results on the field. Over and out.
reading the phrase ‘useful gambol’ has warmed my spirit on this bang average monday evening
Nobody in world football can do what Romero does, to that level. He’s definitely a ‘unicorn’ player.