Categories
Spurs match reports

Man City 0-4 Spurs: Three Tottenham Talking Points

1. Kulusevski

If you ever spot Dejan Kulusevski sloping about the place, and you notice he looks a bit down on himself – gloomy expression, dragging his feet, that sort of thing – it turns out there is one thing absolutely guaranteed to buck him right up and set him skipping gaily down the street. You simply have to tell him that his next opponent will be Man City, and watch him burst into life like a firework that’s just been lit.

Quite what it is about that mob that puts the joys of spring into him is anyone’s guess. They’re one of the last teams I’d want to spend 90 minutes chasing around a field, but there we go. Once Kuluseski clocked whom it was he was up against, he went into absolute overdrive.

There have been times this season when one has speculated that the only thing that might stop Kulusevski in full flow is if he himself decides to stop. Certainly the opposition don’t get much say in it. Yesterday was an absolute prime case in point. If Kulusevski decided to put his head down and barrel his way across half the City team, they were powerless to intervene. Essentially, they were reduced to the role of decorative ornaments, scattered about the place for him to dance around.

Take that first goal. Dragusin began things by lofting a pass in his general direction, and there was not a great deal about it to arrest the attention. Nothing particularly wrong with it, mind. It was perfectly acceptable stuff. Neither, however, did it seem to be of much consequence. City had hardly been carved open. It was essentially a waft. Kulusevski, upon gathering the thing in, one suspected, would have to put in some elbow-grease if he wanted to generate any mileage from it.

But in the blink of an eye, this season’s new, supercharged iteration of the Swede had not just generated mileage, he’d set up an opportunity for Maddison that, if not quite on a plate, was about nine-tenths of the way there. In the first place he niftily turned infield, and then gave that Gvardiol fellow a friendly shove to clear the paths.

That might not sound like much, but if you’ve ever had the honour of drinking in the full dimensions of Gvardiol from close quarters, you’ll be aware that his physique has much about it of a sturdy tree trunk. To illustrate the point, if I were to try similarly attempt to hand off Gvardiol, I’d wager that I’d quite likely sprain a wrist, and possibly also bounce off him and over the advertising hoardings.  Kulusevski however, shoved him aside, and aside he remained. And this highlights one of the principal merits of the fellow: he’s a meaty young blighter.

We then benefited from a timely dart from Pedro Porro, up the right flank. While Kulusevski deemed this offer of assistance beneath him, that Gvardiol lump was sufficiently distracted to take a step or two to track the run. Kulusevski did not stop to enquire how that detour was treating him, but instead beavered infield into the vacant space.

At this point, one might report that he swung in a cross, and such an observation would, I suppose, hold up in court. Factually correct, I mean to say. Not a syllable of untruth contained therein.

And yet, simply to say this and no more would be to understate the thing like the dickens. It would be like stating that Van Gogh painted flowers. No denying it, but by golly you’d shoot an enquiring look and wonder when the juicy detail would kick in. So it was with Kulusevski’s cross, for it was a specimen of the highest order. One ought really to cart it at the next awards ceremony and give a short speech in its honour.

To give it its due acclaim, all the key mechanical elements could be ticked off for a start. That is to say it was of the appropriate height, and weight, and so forth. Layered upon all these, though, were what you might call the standout features. The cross was flighted perfectly over the head of the patrolling central defender, for example, removing from him the option of simply standing and heading clear, or even of leaping a foot or two and heading clear. It was one of those crosses that to all intents and purposes wiped the p.c.d. briefly from existence.

And having had requisite height to do what might be termed Part One of the operation, the cross then similarly ticked off Part Two, by dipping sufficiently so as to allow Maddison to meet it with a well-timed foot. Not too high, not bouncing awkwardly, not too far in front of him; but weighted just so.

On top of which, this was one of that eye-catching class of crosses that does not simply drop to someone’s feet, but is whipped into a vacant space. Now while further applause can be directed Kulusevski’s way, this aspect also requires a partner in the operation, who is tuned into the same wavelength, and is willing to gallop into the vacant space. And this was where Maddison chimed in so sensibly.

All these elements neatly flowed together, both Maddison and Kulusevski timing thing as if they’d been rehearsing for weeks. As will be expanded upon below, Maddison deserves top marks for his role in the drama, but the genesis of the goal, and frankly the whole victory, was brought by Kulusevski.

Thereafter, the chap simply would not be silenced. It was an odd sort of game, in that we could hardly be said to have had control of things, particularly in the first half and particularly when out of possession. We largely relied upon City to mangle their opportunities, rather than preventing them from having any. However, similarly, when we were in possession, we led City a pretty merry dance, and Kulusevski was at hub of most of our incisive work.

The third goal was another example of this. It should be emphasised that the goals lend themselves as rather obvious illustrations of his evening’s work, but his contribution was not limited to these and these alone. It was not the case that he bobbed up on these two occasions and clocked off for the remainder, content to loiter in the background and shirk his duties. Kulusevski was menace to City every time he gathered the ball.

The goals do stick in the memory though. The third started with the Swede embracing in his inner Maradona, and twisting the living daylights out of every City player in his path. The naked eye could barely follow what was happening, such was the twinkle-toed nature of his burst. His little dribble was all the more pleasing for leading eventually to a goal, for when such moments of trickery lead to naught they can sometimes be lost in the mists of time. On this occasion, however, having danced his way past several flummoxed opponents, Kulusevski then played a delicate one-two with Sonny before haring off down the left.

His pass for Solanke thereafter was actually probably a little overhit, but the latter did a solid job of recycling things, before Porro applied the finishing touch.

A couple of standout moments then, in an altogether rip-roaring outing from the chap. Once he gets going, there really is no stopping him.

2. Maddison

The other outstanding performance was posted by young Maddison, which I must admit surprised me a little. It was just about a year ago that the young imp hobbled off against Chelsea on that fateful nine-men-on-halfway evening, and since then he has looked decidedly short of the old pep. Bit of a shadow of his former self. Always happy enough to muck in, to his credit, but rarely doing too much to stop the casual observer in their tracks and have them mouthing, “By golly” or something similar.

Yesterday, however, Maddison returned to form; or, more accurately, it seemed to me, discovered two new and hitherto untapped areas of form, which he claimed as his own. What I mean is that previously, and in the first few months of his Tottenham career, back in the summer of 2023, Maddison seemed to strut about the place creating opportunities for others. He’d collect the ball in advanced positions and thread, this way and that, some passes of the exceptionally cunning variety. Creator-in-chief, one might say, and well we needed him.

Quite a different beast on show yesterday though. His goals, for a start, had about them much of the Scholes, Platt or Dele. The first in particular was a triumph for the fine but oft-neglected art of surging forward from midfield, reaching the edge of the area and then carrying right on with the surging. In a system such as ours, in which poor old Solanke can quite often be found knee-deep in build-up muck, a goodish distance from goal, all manner of bribes and incentives ought to be flung at the midfield posse to elevate to the top of their To-Do List the essential role of arriving in the area for scraps.

And Maddison did that yesterday like a pro. As elaborated upon above, Kulusevski played his part in that opening goal with aplomb, but it would have resulted in a sigh, a little pirouette on the spot and some further sideways and backwards rot, if Maddison had not carpe’d the diem.

Having bust a gut to get there, Maddison also deserves credit for controlling his volley, which I think is the technical term for those moments when one avoids lashing the ball over the bar and off into the thinner part of the atmosphere.

His role in the second goal was even better. When the press exerted by various chums brought about an errant City pass, Maddison seized upon it like a hyena who’s spotted one of the slower members of the Serengeti gang loping his way. In a trice Maddison had collected the ball, nor did he dawdle in shoving it at Sonny. Importantly, having shoved, Maddison did not stop to admire his work either, but was struck with the winning notion that he might as well race off to the other side of the area.

One exquisite Son flick later, and Maddison was in on goal; but if one were to sit back in one’s seat and opine that all he had left to do was tap the thing home and welcome the acclaim, one would need a pretty sharp correction.

For a start, travelling at pace, Maddison’s first touch needed to be top-tier stuff. Too soft and the ball would be left behind; too hard and it would bounce off him and away. He therefore did an impressive job of dragging it along with him, even while on the gallop. The sequel that immediately followed was even more impressive, for who amongst us does not enjoy a dinked finish over an onrushing goalkeeper? Credit, then, by the bucketful. I did not know he had such things in his armoury.

These goals having been despatched, Maddison then devoted the rest of his evening to produce from an entirely different genre altogether. He seemed to dust away all his attacking gear, and lock it in the attic for another day. The focus of the remainder of his evening was to collect the ball from Vicario and chums, in his own defensive third.

If you’ve regularly passed by this corner of the interweb you may know that AANP is not too hot on this business of playing out from the back. And when I say ‘not too hot’, I add a thick layer of scorn, and a pretty evil eye. Dashed nuisance, if you ask me. It regularly leads to us ceding possession in dangerous areas; and even when it does work, it rarely gets us as far as the halfway line.

Anyway, we were at it again yesterday, of course, so I took a deep breath and duly braced myself. However, what unfurled was arguably our finest hour and a half of peddling this building-from-the-back gubbins. It actually worked, pretty well and on repeated occasions. And there at the heart of it all was Maddison.

His juices presumably flowing like nobody’s business after his goals, every time we had a goal kick he availed himself of possession in the most precarious positions conceivable, right on the edge of his own area, and seemingly unfazed by the close attentions of City bods lurking on his shoulder. And I’ll be dashed if each and every time he did not successfully hold onto possession. He dipped his shoulder as appropriate and swerved away from danger, protecting the ball and finding a chum. It was an approach that absolutely dripped with risk, and yet Maddison pulled it off every time.

This was remarkable in itself, but it also meant that, having bobbed and weaved past the City press, he was able to set us off on our way, over halfway and on the counter-attack.

Whether or not he can do this every week we’ll have to wait and see I suppose, but yesterday he orchestrated things from deep like it was the role for which he had been preparing since birth.

3. Our Defence

With VDV and Romero still poorly, we had to make do with Davies and Dragusin at centre-back, and I suppose the record books will now show for eternity that the pair of them kept a clean-sheet, so well done them. However, that they did so, especially in the first 10 minutes or so, seemed to defy physics.

I touched earlier upon the peculiarity of this one, in terms of our lack of control in the first half in particular. If you happened to grab the Sunday morning papers and cast an eye over the score-line, you might well have cheerily assumed that City failed to lay a glove, given it not a moment’s further thought and duly flicked over to the Sudoku puzzle, a cheery whistle on your lips.

This, while understandable enough, would have been a wild misdiagnosis of events. City most certainly did lay gloves upon us. In fact, several of their punches landed and left us staggering drunkenly about the canvas – as, it should be pointed out, ours did them. Essentially, whichever team had the ball looked like they would score within two shakes of a lamb’s tail. That City didn’t owed a lot to some off-colour finishing, as well as an exceptional display of limb-extension (and at one point, torso-existence) from young Vicario.

Credit where due, in the second half our midfield five rolled up their sleeves and formed a tight unit in front of the defence. This seemed to cheese off the City mob sufficiently, forcing them off into all sorts of scenic routes on the peripheries. They still eked out a fair number of close-range chances, mind, any one of which, if converted, would have had the nervous glances firing in all directions. However, as the game wore on, and our goal tally racked upon, the light in their eyes rather died.

Few would have predicted that, after an opening 10 or so in which they trampled all over us. And while Davies and Dragusin undoubtedly drew short straws in having to face up to Haaland, Foden et al for this one, they didn’t exactly help themselves in those opening exchanges.

Haaland missed two pretty straightforward knockings early on. The first of which emanated from Davies darting forward to win the ball high up, missing the ball, and duly finding himself out of position while City went on the charge. When the ball eventually squirted out to Haaland he had the freedom of the penalty area, but oddly decided to pause and reflect on things, in which time Davies was able to scamper back and effect a block.

Full marks for scampering back and blocking, of course, but the whole episode might have been avoided with better judgement earlier on in the piece. (A quiet chiding here, too, for Bissouma, for not having the presence of mind to step back into Davies’ vacant spot and fill in for him when he disappeared a-wandering.)

Not to be outdone, a minute or two later Dragusin pulled an identical trick, lunging for the ball and finding himself kicking at thin air as Savio tootled away. Again, no ill transpired, but the omens hardly filled one to the gills with confidence.

Thereafter, at least, the pair had the decency to keep their noses clean. It is only fair to applaud them for sticking to the task for the remainder, and without huge alarm. As mentioned, we did still rely on Vicario an awful lot, but one imagines the pair of them will feel a heck of lot better for having a clean-sheet to their name, against that lot of all lots.

And ultimately, with a tip of the cap to Herr Werner for doing what very few have ever done before, and skinning Kyle Walker, we rode off into the sunset with one of the finest score-lines of the Postecoglou era.

Of course, none of it counts, as Rodri was injured, and that simply is not fair on City; but is there anything more maddeningly Spurs-esque, than to lose at home to Ipswich, before travelling to City and hammering them? Marvellously entertaining, of course, and if we ever stumble upon some consistency we’ll be a heck of a force to be reckoned with, but for now I try not to think of whatever shock defeat is forthcoming, and simply enjoy the moment.

Need a Christmas stocking-filler for the Spurs-supporter in your life? Keep your eyes peeled, for a new AANP book will soon be arriving on this site.

Sharing is daring:

19 replies on “Man City 0-4 Spurs: Three Tottenham Talking Points”

Didn’t mention it, but 8 half expected a reaction of this nature. Last international break the slip up was Palace followed 2 weeks later by despatching Villa. Now 2 weeks of grinding on the Ipswich loss we got this result. With Roma and Fulham up next but England done for 2024 the LWLWLW going back to the start of October and pesky Seagulls, will hopefully steady the ship in the right direction. In fact, speaking of Brighton at halftime were we not all praying history was not about to repeat itself?

I suppose. Would like to think it shouldn’t matter what the previous or next fixture is, but given the WLWL nature of things I suppose we’re all trying to identify a pattern.

This is fine stuff, AANP, and enunciated with such relish for the English language. (I particularly liked “carpe’d the diem”.)
Wonder if you’ve thought of reviewing the post-match interviews too? Of course, Madders on Sky TV was a hoot, but how about Pep? So candid, fatalistic, semi-incomprehensible – how can you not love him and his team a little bit? (As long as we keep beating them.)

Many thanks for the kind words (and if you like my prose, keep an eye out for the imminent AANP book, nudge nudge). Will give the interviews the beady eye next time out.

Enjoyed this match so much whilst previously dreading it as I was walking my mutt pre-match. I pray Timo got a boost from his assist as it it was what we needed from him and he did it at last.

As we know though, our next Premier match is against the mighty Fulham 🙁

Lack of control? As mentioned, it’s not like we kept City at arm’s length throughout.

It’s often said that we need to find consistency – I think we actually have with LWLWLW 🙂

It’s typical of us, as long in the tooth Spurs supporters, to underplay the score – it wasn’t a 4-0 thrashing – we took 4 out of 5 ‘clear-cut’ chances while City missed a similar number- but our overall performance was much-improved and in particular the attitude was very encouraging. Clearly Maddison hadn’t spent the international break sipping Martinis by the pool in Ibiza while thumbing through his Littlewoods catalogue looking for a new fetching woolly hat & scarf combo – he seems to have had a good look at himself instead. Indeed there was a lot of reference to the team members as ‘family’ in players post-match interviews – hopefully this means that there was a lot of collective soul-searching after Ipswich and the lads have made sacred vows and agreed to recommit to the cause.

Amazing performance by each and every player. You could see that Sonny was really encouraging the players to keep their levels up, especially when we were 2-0 up, and the players responded. It’s good that they (finally!) realised what we, as Spurs fans, have been painfully aware of for many years… that it isn’t over until it’s over. This time we made sure it was over. Could that have something to do with a certain brilliant but sometimes casual Argentinian centre back not being in the line up?
I think there were a multitude of things that contributed to the win, and especially the level of performance.

1. We didn’t play a suicidal high line.
It would have been a very different game if we had. Giving Haaland lots of open space would have been disastrous without VDV’s recovery pace, and forced us to change our style. Thankfully, he didn’t have his shooting boots on, and we were reliant on Vicario to make some really good saves, but every chance he had was rushed, and only one was from a central position. Huge credit to Dragusin and Davies, who put their bodies on the line, played sensibly with the ball, defended set pieces really well, and looked comfortable throughout. They were never going to keep Haaland quiet for 90 minutes, but I don’t recall anybody else having any decent chances.

2. No Doku.
Everyone will point to Rodri’s absence, along with Kovacic, Reuben Dias, etc, which definitely helped us from an attacking perspective, but the speed and directness of Doku in one-to-one situations has caused us huge problems in the past, and without that outlet they were one paced. We were able to crowd out Savinho on the other side, who is very clever and tricky, like Mahrez, but doesn’t have the same explosiveness as Doku.

3. We overpowered them in midfield.
I think we were all worried when Bissouma got a yellow after 15 seconds! But from then on both Bissouma and Sarr really got a grip on the midfield, dominating physically, keeping the ball moving while resisting the press, and getting the ball to our forward players. Sarr is becoming a monster in the middle. Again, he’s another that relies on space to run into, and he isn’t as effective against a low block, but we need players to combat different strategies, and he is becoming invaluable.

4 – Kulusevski.
He just keeps getting better. Back on the RW this time, where he always seems to excel against City, and Saturday was no different. There seems to be a bit of Moussa Dembele in him, in the way you can’t shake him off the ball, but then there’s the quality in the final third with a pass or cross, which couldn’t be more evident than in the first goal, where he shook off Gvardiol no less, and found the onrushing Maddison with pinpoint accuracy. His contribution for Porro’s goal, although the pass to Solanke was slightly overhit, was unbelievable.
I fear that it won’t be long before City start sniffing around him, as Pep is constantly singing his praises, but hopefully he keeps improving and drags us along with him, as he is definitely future captain material.

5. Maddison.
His most complete performance in a Spurs shirt bar none. Talent has never been the problem. Fitness and application have been found wanting since game 11 against Chelsea last season. Dropping deep against low block teams instead of being in positions where he can do damage. Fading after 60 minutes. Slowing the game down when we needed to play quickly, etc. None of that on Saturday! He made runs beyond the striker, and was rewarded, twice, both times with excellent finishes. The second one, especially, was exquisite. And then, later on, once he’d done his damage, he did drop deeper, helped us beat their press, taking the ball on in dangerous situations with confidence and skill, allowing us to hit them on the break. I really hope he takes this on, stays fit, and keeps this discipline against more defensive teams.

6. Johnson/Werner.
This is how you use them! Johnson’s pace and ability to get in at the back post are his only real assets, and coming off the bench when the opposition are chasing the game utilises them perfectly, as long as we still have the energy and inclination to attack which, with a fresh Werner on the other flank, we did. It was only when the 4th goal went in that we could actually relax, which is an indictment of what we have to go through as Spurs fans!

City’s style does seem to suit us, even if we don’t always get the result. But what was most impressive in my opinion was our confidence. The way we kept playing our football, constantly beating their press, getting out of tight areas, and with no Rodri we were really able to take advantage once we did. Yes, they could have scored a few goals, but we could also have scored more.

Obviously, we played them at a good time. But they were unbeaten in 52 matches at home, so this was still an amazing result and an amazing performance, especially with the players we had missing. Sadly, nobody would be surprised if we have a stinker at home to Fulham, who are a really good side, despite their loss to Wolves on the weekend, and with them having a week to rest and prepare while we play Roma on Thursday, with no sign of Romero or VDV being back in time for either match, and our record in London derbies under Ange is shocking. I’d like to say that the penny has finally dropped with the players, and that they will treat every game like a cup final, but we will see how this week goes. We will have to rotate, but we don’t really have options at CB, and Spence’s omission from the Europa League squad seems stranger by the minute. Thankfully Bentancur can, and will, play on Thursday, but I worry for Davies playing 3 games in 8 days. Hopefully Ange can find the right balance, as the games will now be coming thick and fast, and a strong run would see us fly up the table, but a few more injuries would leave us threadbare until the transfer window opens.

At least we’re able to smile this week!

Neat summary Sir.

About Johnson, I’ve been pleasantly surprised to note that, actually he is not “one dimensional”. When he occasionally moves in-field, his interplays in our forrays are usually quite fruitful…it’s seems there’s a footballer in there

Are you talking about that one interplay where he miscontrolled the pass, and then Kulusevski played a lovely diagonal to Solanke who chipped it over the keeper? Other than that, I can’t think of anything!
He is an impact sub when space opens up. Against a low block he offers next to nothing. Did you see his stats vs Ipswich? We basically played with 10 men.

That one yes and just a handfull of other occasions..(occasionally moves in-field)…

If I’m not mistaken he has netted about 3 goals from a central position?

But I agree with your analyses RE: low blocks.

A few weeks ago someone asked when do we Spurs fans feel comfortable with a lead.
I told her indoors I was going to switch the TV off when we went 1 nil up then at least I could enjoy us being in the lead. At two nil I said now I am really going to switch it off but morbid curiosity got the better of me. At 3 nil she asked if I was confident of the win. I didn’t dare admit it but just about was.
Am i confident we will beat Roma and Fulham? Nope.

To make it a level playing field Spurs ought to be given a 4-0 lead before the start of each match so we can all relax and enjoy the game.

AANP, I think you overlooked the possible fact that Madders actually shinned the ball in for the first—nice deflection, nevertheless. And, AANP, thy middle name is “verbose!” I needed my super deluxe thesaurus for translations.

Comments are closed.