1. Some Lovely Goals
You’ll have to excuse AANP for adopting all the subtlety of a tabloid rag, but I’ll start the wittering today with the headline stuff. No doubt there are reams to be written about all the tactical minutiae and subtle dialogue that bubbled away beneath the surface for the first 45, but when one is treated to four goals as humdinging in their own special ways as ours were today, one has to pause and ask oneself, where else could one possibly start?
1.1 Our First Goal
Although Brennan Johnson deserves to have his hair ruffled for sneaking his way to the front of the queue while the doormen weren’t looking, and duly hoovering up from the platter in front of him (an act almost certainly designed to ram back down AANP’s throat the decision to expel him from my Fantasy Team), the real hero of our opening goal was Sonny.
Any cross from the flank is generally a means to an end, very much playing a supporting role in the great scheme of attacking things. Every once in a while, however, one is treated to a cross so dripping in quality that the eyes bulge from their moorings and a spontaneous soundtrack of gasps breaks out to accompany it. Sonny’s delivery for our first goal was of this ilk.
Oddly enough, it seemed to spring into existence from nowhere. I vaguely recall Son having received the ball out wide on the left on numerous occasions in the first half, without having really given any indication that a cross for the ages was on the cards. But in keeping with the general post-break uptick in intensity, in minute 49 he did not dwell too long on the potential implications, and instead, as soon as allowed a yard of space, put his head down and wrapped his foot around the ball.
As mentioned, that Johnson eventually scrawled his signature on the bottom of the thing to make it official was almost incidental. The quality of the inbound delivery, in this instance, was everything. Curl, pace, optimal height – whatever a striker of sound mind would add to their wish-list for a delivery from out wide, this cross had it. Not to have converted it would have been a travesty bordering on the criminal.
1.2 Our Second Goal
The highlight of our second goal was undoubtedly the finish. I had been muttering to my Spurs-supporting chum Ian that Solanke, as far as I can remember, has yet to have benefitted from a straightforward one-on-one during his time in lilywhite. He’s poked in a few close-range rebounds, and been crowded out while trying to fashion a chance from the edge of the area, but I can’t quite recall one of those Werner-esque opportunities when the striker eyeballs the goalkeeper, time stands still and it’s just the two of them locking horns.
Well thanks to some whizz-popping outside the area by Johnson and Kulusevski, Solanke had his big moment, and by golly the finish he produced was a doozy.
With the spotlight on Solanke, and a couple of games in his rear-view mirror in which he’d not had so much as a sniff of goal, when the ball broke for him inside the area one might have feared a lack of confidence. Not a bit of it. With AANP baying for him to lash the thing, Solanke unwrapped a manoeuvre that only those pumped to the gills with confidence can dare to attempt, and, allowing Martinez to spread himself about the place like a prime chump, dinked the ball over him to nestle almost nonchalantly in the net.
If Sonny’s earlier assist merited a commemorative mural somewhere off the High Road, then this finish from Solanke merits similar consideration. It doesn’t matter how they go in, I suppose, but that finish had me viewing the man with awe etched across my features for the remainder.
And within the generally approving din, one ought not to neglect the build-up to that goal. I’m not sure that Johnson necessarily intended his first-time pass to Kulusevski just outside the area, but there can be no doubt that Kulusevski meant the short diagonal pass that cut to ribbons the Villa back-line. Kulusevski’s pass practically tore in half the defender tasked with monitoring Solanke as he tried in vain to keep tabs both on the striker on his eastern wing and the ball rolling westwards.
1.3 Our Third Goal
No doubt about it, a quizzical ripple echoed around N17 when, in the aftermath of our equaliser, Our Glorious Leader decided that Sonny’s race was run. And the volume on that ripple was turned up a notch or two, at least at AANP Towers, when the cunning plan to fill the Son-shaped hole was revealed to constitute one primed and ready Richarlison, as Mikey Moorer and Timo Werner no doubt exchanged quizzical looks on the bench.
Big Ange, to his credit, has made some reasonably sound mid-game switches in recent weeks, the replacement of Maddison with Sarr vs West Ham being the most notable; and moreover I consider myself one of the most loyal supporters of the man; but every now and then there comes a time in one’s life when one’s only course of action is to survey events and unleash a deeply disturbed sigh. When Richarlison replaced Son that is precisely the severe course of action I undertook.
For a few minutes it seemed that Ange might have bungled things somewhat, Richarlison certainly bounding about enthusiastically in his defensive duties, but not really fulfilling the attacking terms of the contract.
However, if Ange wanted to direct a look of vindication towards me in the immediate aftermath of the third goal he’d have had my blessing, because Richarlison absolutely nailed his big moment. Released by Sarr and within sight of goal, he (and big Dom Solanke to his right) would not doubt have been unsurprised to have heard the now familiar sound of AANP baying at him to lash the thing. It is to his enormous credit therefore that he waved away this option, and instead somehow located through an absolute forest of legs the onrushing Solanke for a tap-in (rich reward for another afternoon of non-stop running on his part).
So, reading left to right, credit was duly bestowed upon Richarlison, Solanke and Postecoglou, the only blot on the landscape being that Richarlison is made of biscuits, and as such, managed to do himself a mischief in the act of gently delivering a six-yard pass.
1.4 Our Fourth Goal
We Spurs-supporting folk have been rather starved of goals from free-kicks over the years. Kieran Trippier twanged in a couple in his time, Harry Kane leathered them everywhere but the goal and Christian Eriksen may have struck oil once or twice, but in the post-Bale era it feels like these were very much the exceptions rather than the norms.
The sight of Maddison delivering one into the top corner was therefore a rare old treat. Moreover, there is something particularly becoming about a well-executed free-kick. It has a certain flawless quality to it, don’t you think? No deflections, or scrambles amongst the riff-raff, just a single, honest strike, and an unfettered pathway from turf to net.
By that point it was turning into a hot day for murals on the little side-roads, as this was yet another of those goals that oozed good, wholesome aesthetic value. It had the additional benefit of finally allowing those of us of a more nervous disposition when watching Spurs, finally to exhale. 3-1 going into ten additional minutes felt fraught with risk; 4-1 with three minutes to go felt just about secure.
2. Sarr
In detailing our second and third goals I rather ignored the starters and nibbles, and in each case ploughed straight into the main course. With some reason, for as mentioned, Solanke’s finish and Richarlison’s presence of mind, had about them much to commend.
But the notable omission in each case was the healthy shift put in by Pape Sarr, and while it is a little tedious simply to direct the spotlight on goal involvements and ignore everything else, in this instance it seems acceptable enough, as Sarr’s contribution to those two goals neatly encapsulated so much that was good about him today.
While I thought he was busy without necessarily stamping authority upon proceedings in the first half (Bentancur arguably outshining him in central midfield, with a neat combo of tidy passing and forthright tackling), Sarr’s ability to keep charging about the place, while all others run out of puff and wheezily pause for breath, motored us along in the second session.
In the build-up to our second goal it was Sarr who collected the scraps won by Davies, and then played the ball forward for Johnson and Kulusevski to begin treading the measure together, before sliding in Solanke. Admittedly there was plenty of legwork still to do after Sarr’s contribution – I hardly present the case that Sarr and Sarr alone created the goal, and as noted above Kulusevski and then Solanke were the standout performers in that little scene.
But that Sarr should have collected the ball in the first place said much about his spirit of defensive willing, in having tracked back. Moreover, while it might not seem particularly momentous that he then walked the ball forward fifteen yards and drilled it forward another ten, it was precisely what the situation demanded, and, at 1-1, it was the sort of signal of positive intent that I suspect would have been rejected by such recent N17 luminaries as Hojbjerg, Skipp et al.
If Sarr’s contribution to our second was adequate enough, his input into our third was vastly more significant. It began with him pouncing on a loose pass from a Villa cheese, which in itself merited the approving nod, it demonstrating a sprightly awareness of current affairs and the energy levels required to make Angeball tick.
Having intervened thusly in the centre circle, however, there was still plenty of honest toil through which to plough. The situation was promising no doubt, Sarr receiving assistance from three on his right and one on his left, but a few key tasks required ticking off before the collective roar of approval sounded. The odds were beginning to favour Sarr, particularly as he worked up a head of steam and headed towards the area, but some clear thinking would imminently be required.
He played his part to perfection. Having taken receipt of the ball on the white of the centre circle, he dragged it with him at a healthy lick until 20 yards from goal. At this point, with options to his right and even the potential for a shot, he wisely identified that Richarlison, to his left, as the most profitable route, and for added value he rolled the ball such that no break of stride was required. As detailed above, Richarlison then played his part, and Solanke his.
For Sarr, these contributions captured in two microcosms much of what was good about his performance – indefatigable energy, married with intelligent and attack-minded decision-making.
3. What Romero Might Learn From Ben Davies
I suspect not even the wildest optimists amongst us would have hoped for this scoreline when wiping the Sunday roast from our lips an hour or two earlier, so it was just a shame that the triumph was not achieved without casualties.
Richarlison, as mentioned, is cursed with a constitution that dictates that nature will simply find a way to hobble him before the night is out; but Romero’s latest mishap appeared to be entirely self-afflicted, and brought about by yet another demonstration of a yawning vacancy between his ears.
I can understand that there are some for whom a meaty challenge is the pinnacle of an afternoon’s on-pitch entertainment, and if well-timed and properly executed I suppose I’m accepting enough of such things. I’d always be inclined to have a think about the immediate fallout myself – where the ball lands, who is covering the prone defender, and so forth – but if the idea is simply to shut down an attack, shovel the ball out of play and make sure the attacker is felled like an oak, then I can lend my vote. Bentancur ticked all of the above boxes in one such episode in the first half, and AANP was happy enough to chip in with some polite applause.
But when Romero decided to wipe out his man midway through the second half, the reaction over here was markedly less sunny. One learns to curb the tongue, of course, but if I had thickened the air with the foulest discourse it would have been with some justification.
Put squarely, there was just no need. Villa were piecing together the beginnings of an attack, of that there can be no doubt, but this was no goal-saving moment. They were on halfway, for goodness’ sake. The Villa scally had just ridden two other challenges, and Pedro Porro was hoving into view to keep him company during his upfield progression – all of which suggested that the attacker could simply have been monitored as he advanced, and escorted off towards the side of the pitch if necessary. In short, Romero could have stayed on his feet.
By flying in on halfway, Romero was effectively removing himself from the defensive line-up in the immediate aftermath – at a point in the game at which the score was 1-1, close enough to require the avoidance of oaf-like defensive risks. Why he could not simply have stayed on his feet and kept abreast of things at a gallop is beyond me. The clueless berk seems obsessed with the notion that full-stretch diving challenges in the middle of the pitch constitute good defending.
Not only did he pick up a pretty obvious yellow card for his troubles, he also inflicted sufficient damage upon his own frame to require his removal – at a time when we are already shorn of Micky Van de Ven. The thoughtlessness of the whole episode was maddening.
Clearly in need of a spot of instruction on the basics, Romero would have done well to have observed from the treatment room the conduct of Ben Davies fifteen minutes later, in what turned out to be the build-up to our second goal. I mentioned previously that Sarr picked up the scraps to set in motion events for this goal; those aforementioned scraps were earned by Davies.
Villa had nabbed possession on the edge of their own area, and played the ball up to halfway, and with Watkins in possession might have been away on the counter with one deft touch. Enter Davies, who rather than channelling his inner Romero and lunging in horizontally, instead stayed on his feet to extend a single well-judged leg. This was comfortably sufficient to win the ball (and, as events transpired, turned into the pass from which Sarr created our goal), but also had the useful side-effect of keeping Davies upright and able to deal with any untoward consequences. Not a yellow card, or self-inflicted injury, in sight.
For all Romero’s handy passing from the back, his approach to defending strikes me each week as absolutely laden with unnecessary risk and error.
The consequences of all that might be felt in the coming weeks; but for tonight at least, this was quite the win. It seems that all too often we stream home at the conclusion chuntering away about an inability to take chances, and how we really ought to have scored at least four and wrapped up the thing – so one is entitled to dance a pretty satisfied jig after having done exactly that, on the back of plenty of good, honest endeavour, and against one of the division’s tougher nuts.
21 replies on “Spurs 4-1 Villa: Three(ish) Tottenham Talking Points”
agreed with the compilmentary remarks about our main protagonists. However may I respectfully add my two pennorth about our best “unsung hero” of the day who I haven’t heard mentioned once so far……. young master Dragusin!! When you are without the speediest central defender ever known to our team, and then lose (by the very stupidity mentioned in your report) – our very own World Cup winner, then you could be excused for thinking we might stuggle more than a little against one of the best attacks in the Division. However it was never obvious that we were so “Short staffed” as our Mr Dragusin, ably supported by the excellent Ben Davies compelely dominated their attack!
I agree on Dragusin, he’s top drawer without doubt. I didn’t think I’d ever admit this publicly but Romero isn’t the future, we can get some money for him in the summer and buy some CB brains.
Great work from the team but the first half was tough as always. Solanke was superb, works so hard every game and I love him.
Sadly we got to go to Turkey this week then face the mighty Ipswich next week. Tough emotions ahead!
I’m still not yet convinced by Dragusin! (Not to say I think he’s bad, but jury still out.) Looked solid enough, but one or two unsteady moments (e.g. late in the first half when he needlessly ran the ball out for a throw right by the corner flag had me choking in consternation). Possibly being over-harsh. There’ll be plenty further opportunities to size him up in the coming weeks.
Wasn’t Mr. Sarr involved in the build-up of all of our first 3 goals? He’s essentially putting Madders on the bench, recently.
Great stuff, AANP. Just a footnote to your musings on Son suddenly producing the cross for the first goal: the analysis on MotD2 shrewdly pointed out that Udogie reverted to an overlapping role after HT, which visibly allowed Sonny the space to deliver the ball. Tactics, eh.
Re the muted dissatisfaction with the centre-backs – which might be largely dispelled by a brief mention of Davinson Sanchez and Eric Dier – I’d perhaps point to 3 teenagers who are already on the books (Phillips, Dorrington, and the awaited Vuscovic). Could be we’ll be well stocked there in a couple of years.
Indeed, hadn’t picked up on the udogie point at all during the game.
Good injection of perspective with the mentions of dier and sanchez! I await with interest Vuscovic in particular.
Isn’t it great to have a convincing win against a top 4 contender? I agree there is a question mark over Romero’s game sense and it could well be that a massive offer from Real Madrid could be an acceptable solution come summer – but he is still young and maybe a bit immature – he could (like us all) grow out of silly habits. That was the only negative to report although maybe someone is tempted to have a go at Vicario for not being strong enough to collect the corner that produced their goal. Reality is that any blame should be laid at our near post defence.
Solanke & Sarr were the standouts as reported and Udogie looks to be recovering his best form at last. My opinion of Dragusin is coloured by his awkward running style which makes him look clumsy but he did a good job and will need to keep improving as he is required to start for a number of weeks now. I wonder if Ben Davies – never a favourite of mine – will be offered a contract extension or leave on a free in the summer?
Two(ish) quick observations
– Ben Davies has plenty in terms of game reading were he lacks in pace..He reminds me of John Terry who played well into the sunset of his career…(some one once asked: “has anyone ever seen John Terry’s sprinting gait? None.. but boy didn’t he snuff out hundreds of fires in his career).
About Pape Sarr, His ability to make himself useful at every phase of the game is quietly startling…in a few years time he might own Rodri Street.
It’s shocking how Conte consistently overlooked him, but was immediately snapped up by Ange and trusted with half a dozen or so variety of positional duties.
Strong shouts on both counts, sir
Loved Villa’s well thought out plan for their corners….. goes something like…. 1 Study previous videos of our games, especially V Everton. 2 Push goalkeeper as hard as humanly possible. 3 Wait for keeper to respond in kind. 4 Push defender on to goalkeeper as hard as humanly possible. Wait for defender to respond in kind…….. Repeat ad nauseam from #2…… How on earth can refs allow tactics like this to carry on?? It’s got beyond ridiculous now…..they wait for ref to come over and “have a word”…. wait for him to step back to his position and then 2 steps later, as soon as his back is turned they gleefully start the whole process again!! Why is it no longer punished with a free kick when it’s such an obvious foul!! I don’t get it. I must be too old school!!
I totally agree with your sentiments on this issue Phil, every time a corner is awarded against us my heart sinks (similar to when Timo gets a one-on-one against a goalkeeper) But, is Vicario the only goalkeeper in the league with this problem and, also, why don’t Spurs follow the same tactics on corners if they’re legal?
Our corners are usually a bit lame TBH as are Porro’s throw ins which seem to take forever until he runs out of patience and throws it to the opposition. Also, why don’t we have a long throw specialist in the team, they can be as good as corners?
That line about Porro’s throws made me chuckle.
Have you noticed how often he takes the ball off of others who are ready to take a quick throw in then spends 5 minutes trying to find somebody to throw it to. It was the same last season, he clearly got the throw-in captain’s job without any training on throwing it to our own players 🙂
It’s an amazing phenomenon that exactly 7 days ago we were stuck at doom-and-gloomsville and here we are in cock-a-hoop city. Thursday night football in Turkey upcoming followed by an “easy” (not) game on Sunday in Suffolk. Will my poor old heart stand it? COYS
As they say a week is a long time in politics (well this week especially)!
Home game against Ipswich on Sunday … which version of Spurs will show up?
No one compares to Kane, but it is fair to say Solanke adds something to Anges game that Harry wouldn’t have; pressing. He’s upped the effectiveness of our whole pressing game by 20% . A far better footballer than I’d realised too.
Agree. Good for for Angeball.
Very much agree…… used to get so mad at H, great player and goalscorer, but would so rarely tackle defenders strolling past him with the ball!!
On a different site (headline “worst manager in 15 years”) I briefly saw red at such madness and pointed out that we could either play with a triangle of Biss, Bentie and one of Deki or Madders or invert that and play Deks and Mads with Biss/Bennie at the base. Young master Sarr seems to offer a third way holding or pushing as required. Now if we could just get the back 4 to operate as a unit….
That’s the dream…
Worst manager in 15 years? I’ll give benefit of doubt and assume it’s deliberately provocative rather than a sincere opinion. Agree on Sarr, he provides pleasing options.