1. Solanke
My Spurs-supporting chum Ian can be an emotional sort of egg when it comes to all matters lilywhite, but even so, I’ve always found it a tad odd that he harbours a deep dislike of Dominic Solanke. In fact, so intense is this aversion to the chap that he typically refers to him as the English Dirk Kuyt – and let’s face it, there is really no interpretation of that particular moniker that can be seen as a compliment.
Anyway, I’ve personally always been rather fond of Solanke myself, probably to a greater extent than he’s ever actually merited, primarily on the grounds that, in terms of build, he strikes me as resembling a sturdy tree trunk. Some may shoot the unconvinced glass at that one, but AANP’s mind is made up. This is the quality to which all self-respecting centre-forwards should aspire, and it was on display yesterday for the first of his double.
Now every spare column inch going has been stuffed to the gills with praise for his second, and while I’m as happy as the next man to offer a generous hand for anyone who can backheel a volley mid-air on a Sunday afternoon, in truth it has made little lastingimpression upon me. It was all a bit improvised, and owed far too much to closing one’s eyes and blindly wafting. A Van de Ven length-of-the-pitch effort it was not. In fact, I consider Palhinha’s overhead the other week to have had more juice to it, that having been very clearly intended, having been a recognised technique and having been illustrated by history to have been a dashed difficult routine to execute.
Whereas Solanke’s was the footballing equivalent of closing the eyes and swinging the bat. All good wholesome fun of course, but I suppose I just prefer my football to be a bit more obviously football-related. Solanke’s finish, while perfectly legal, seemed more something born of interpretative dance.
Over in this quarter, I was far more taken by his man-handling of the Khusanov chap, during the construction phase of his first goal. To remind, young Simons popped over one of those little outside-of-the-boot numbers, and Solanke set about gathering it in, with Khusanov dutifully trotting over to poke his nose in and try to interfere.
And it was at this point that AANP swooned somewhat, because Solanke proceeded simply to swat Khusanov aside like he was an annoying younger brother in the back garden. It may have lacked the finesse and gymnastics of the second, and been considerably more brutish and unrefined, but the ability to manhandle an opponent out of the way is one of the qualities I most deeply cherish in a striker.
Frankly, Solanke is so often absent that one rather forgets what qualities he does and does not possess, but there was certainly a warm reassurance about this display of brawn. I’m of the opinion that any striker worth his salt ought really to be able to muscle opponents out of the way and generally be a bit of a physical nuisance in the penalty area.
He had much to do thereafter, of course, and funnily enough I considered that his actual finish ought to have been flagged as a very 21st century transgression, and disallowed. Certainly, if roles had been reversed and Guehi had lunged through the back of his calf, I’d have howled for a penalty long into the night. But the goal stood, and a certain smugness descended onto the AANP features and camped in for the night, for as mentioned, I’ve a fondness for Solanke, and this brief combination of brawn and technique seemed to demonstrate what we’ve been missing atop the tree so far this season.
Of course, however, this being Spurs, Solanke’s evening ended with him traipsing off injured.
2. Simons
I mentioned above that he created our first goal with a little sprinkling of elan, and Simons generally bobbed about the place pretty usefully last night.
He deserves a tip of the cap in the first place for being the only one of our number who showed any particular lust for the occasion in the first half, but in the second, as everyone else bucked up their ideas, he put on another of those showings that does seem to emanate from his size sevens when the mood grips him and the stars align.
Being of slender build and not yet sufficiently ripened for the rough and tumble world of English top-flight jousting, Simons does still have a tendency to be knocked from his moorings and sent hurtling up into the air. As well as requiring a considerable amount more meat on his bones, I sometimes wonder if he might also adjust his mindset, perhaps to ready himself for incoming boots and elbows, and evade them as appropriate.
However, one can rarely fault his eagerness. Simons is certainly not one to seek out a quiet corner of the pitch and fade into the background. If the ball is in play, he will generally wave an arm or two requesting it be posted his way, and once it arrives he seems to brim with positive intent, being one of those nibs blessed with the bright idea that the best thing to do with a ball at one’s feet is start haring off towards the opposition goal.
There have been a few mixed reviews for the fellow so far, and I suppose one of those tough old beaks with inscrutable stares would judge that some days he’s been effective and other days entirely not so; but there seems to be enough about Simons to hope that in time he can bed in and become a useful sort of cog.
3. Dragusin
We probably ought really to give young Dragusin a hearty round of applause for having the gumption to pull on the shirt and trot out there to take on Erling Haaland of all people, in his first match in a year or so.
But we lilywhites are unforgiving folk, and at AANP Towers we’re the least forgiving of the lot, so the groans were sounding bright and early in proceedings once Dragusin got involved, and frankly it all felt like he’d never been away.
With Cherki bearing down on goal for the opener, one might have hoped our man could have imposed himself upon the situation to some extent, or at least dangled a meaningful limb in the way of the incoming shot. Instead, the chap opted to try drifting out of existence altogether, and in a move that surprised precisely none of the gathered masses, Cherki belted the ball through him as if he weren’t there.
Shortly afterwards Haaland shoved him aside, in a neat precursor to Solanke’s Khusanov moment, before lobbing the ball onto the roof of the net; and our man then compounded things by spooning the ball straight to Silva, deep inside our half, for the City second.
To repeat, the whole sorry affair can probably be excused on the grounds that here was a vehicle clearly not yet ready for public performance; I suppose the worry is that even at peak fitness, he rarely seems suited for the rigours of the Premier League. Frustrating, because I recall Dragusin putting in a decent turn for Romania in the last Euros; and rather alarming, because the infirmary is spilling over with the walking wounded, at the latest count three of whom were centre-backs.
4. An Odd Second Half Turnaround
If you’ve reached this far down the page and are now licking your lips in anticipation of a forensic going-over of our second half transformation, I’m afraid I have bad news to impart. Fun though it was to watch our lot claw their way back into things, I couldn’t for the life of me tell you what specifically prompted it all.
It’s certainly not the first time this season that our heroes have waited until the opposition have run away with things, and the devoted followers have vented a decent amount of spleen, before sparking into life and belting out a few rousing numbers. I’m not sure I entirely endorse the approach, but I suppose a spot of second half vim is better than no vim at all.
The swapping of Romero for Sarr was the obvious tactical tweak, as we switched to a pleasingly old-fashioned 4-4-2, but frankly I’m not sure that this new-fangled formation was the driving force behind the comeback. This seemed more a case of our lot just racing about the pitch like their lives depended on it, and in a manner completely at odds with the first half.
There was much to admire about Connor Gallagher chasing down two City players and emerging with the ball, before doing some more haring – towards the area – until he could hare no more, and pinged his cross Solanke-wards, for our second. If you excuse me once again glossing over the Solanke acrobatics, the revving up of the Gallagher engine seemed to capture the essence of our second half performance. From nowhere, our lot just seemed to apply themselves rather more.
And while one wants therefore to applaud them all, and bottle that second half to uncork it afresh next weekend, the lingering poser does remain, of why they have to wait until half-time – and until trailing by two – before bothering to compete. I can’t help thinking that Thomas Frank is as clueless as I am about all this, but it’s another stay of execution.
7 replies on “Spurs 2-2 Man City: Four Tottenham Talking Points”
Spot on in every observation as usual AANP, with the usual generous serving of wit on top. Personally I have felt an improvement in us, attacking wise, over the last 5 games… something TFrank has professed himself, so I wanted to check if the stats backed it up. It seemed to me our form this season started well, then fell away from the Wolves last gasp draw onwards… until our most recent 5 games when I feel our performance levels picked up big time (regardless of results). I don’t usually do stats but here goes if you’ll bear with me. In terms of average shots/shots on target & xg; (Prem only) First 5 games = 11.2/3.8 & 1.24 xg. Next 14 games = 8.5/3.2 (shocking!) & 0.9 xg. Most recent 5 = 15.2/6.2 & 1.55 xg. Quite a turn around. As to why, I’m sure we all have opinions. Here’s hoping it continues and brings the rewards it deserves in terms of points (apologies for details- I’ll keep it light next time).
Solanke, surely?
Or possibly the loss of Johnson & Richarlison??
Being a prime nerd I like my stats anyway, but that’s really revealing – thanks for sharing
Nothing whatsoever to disagree with, especially Solanke’s ‘wonder’ goal, which Troy Deeney (I think!) on MOTD correctly said he couldn’t repeat if he tried 500 times. Palhinha’s was one of the best overheads I’ve ever seen, but he’s been labelled a destroyer, and thus gets little or no credit, even losing his starting place earlier this season, while the perennial waste of a shirt Bentancur, was retained. Frank may know what he’s doing, but I’m blowed if I can work it out.
I agree about Paulinha and I thought AANP’s ‘interpretive dance’ description of Solanke’s second was hilarious. Like AANP though I also think Solanke brings something we’ve been lacking. He’ll never fill Harry’s boots (who could) but he a real asset in my book. I thought the second was a fantastic goal. A 500/1 shot in Troy Deeney’s view, correctly, but he took the chance and it came off. That’s his job. It was 100% speculative, but he definitely meant for it to hit the target. It’s nothing like those wild deep crosses which somehow end up in the back of the net. Those are purely unintended 500/1 shots. Solanke could always have just left it of course…and the detractors would have had nothing to talk about
I love Solanke, he works so hard off the ball and is great with his back to goal. When our players get possession they should make an effort to find him and pass it to him rather than 90% of the time doing tippy-tappy sideways and backwards.
The second half performance was a joy to watch, almost to the level of Ange’s first 8 games in charge (before it went downhill).
As far as the transfer window goes I don’t think Spurs did itself any favours in terms of covering long term injuries or getting supporters on-side. My lowest moment last night however was finding that we hadn’t off-loaded Dragusin, Muani and Bissouma 🙁