Man Utd 2-0 Spurs: Three Tottenham Talking Points

1. Romero

This Romero business, what? In fact, I’ll actually gloss over the headline stuff here. The great and good have been tripping over themselves in the last 24 hours to rant and rave about his red cards – and understandably enough. Six of them in his lilywhite career takes some doing, and while one can debate the details of yesterday’s, the loose point remains that here is a soul with a reckless streak that might benefit from an intravenous injection of common sense and restraint.

But as mentioned, that particular line of marketing is one I’ll park for now. Instead, as Romero sloped off for that now-familiar early-exit, the troubling thought that gripped me, vice-like, was to ask myself is this fellow worth it? That is to say, is Romero actually all that good a defender in the first place?

Prevailing wisdom seems to be that here is a fine specimen of a centre-back, whose high-level outputs in the role are sullied only by his regular insistence on kicking unsubtle lumps out of opponents. Oh that we might remove his violent temper, continues the narrative, we would have on our hands a giant amongst defenders – or at the very least 50% of a dashed impressive centre-back pairing.

Where I raise an enquiring finger, however, is on this business of Romero being such a rip-roaring defender in the first place. Because when one stops, and steps back a few paces from the issue, and really gives it thought, one does start to ask oneself – is he actually? Really?

To cover some of the basics, Romero is preferable to, say, poor old Dragusin, but I feel like this does not advance the argument particularly far in either direction. I’ll also gloss over the arguments about Romero’s passing prowess from the back, on the grounds that this strikes me as a pleasant bonus, rather than an essential constituent of defensive DNA. “Defend first, distribute later,” one might say if one were packaging that argument into a natty advertising slogan.

But it’s when we consider the basic art of defending that I start to fidget a little. I’m not suggesting that he’s particularly bad at it, but it seems that his reputation for mastery at the back has been built as much as anything else upon his capacity to abandon his post and thump the dickens out of opposing forwards.

Call me a killjoy, but I’m not such a fan of this approach myself. Even when he times his collisions to perfection it all seems unnecessarily dramatic. One would never have caught Ledley adopting this slant on life. Could the angry young bean not simply stick to his assigned spot, and do all the necessaries from there? Could he not effect his blocks and interceptions and whatnot in the restrained style made popular by countless defenders of the past 100 years, rather than deciding that a tackle is not a tackle unless the opponent is launched into the atmosphere with boot-shaped imprint about his frame?

Frankly, I’ve had my fill of Romero. All that accompanying baggage has wearied me. Should willing suitors come a-sniffing in the summer, and – crucially, and frankly doubtfully – our decision-makers line up a replacement of decent standard, then I’d happily wave him off down the High Road.

2. Vicario

All things considered I’ve also had enough of Vicario, but oddly enough, I thought he put in a handy little showing yesterday. Admittedly, even Vicario on a good day includes at least one badly bungled task, and in the second half one errant pass resulted in the ball finding our net, albeit the flag was raised.

That aside, however, Vicario looked a model of calm and decency. Words I never thought I’d utter, which just goes to show, what? When flying saves had to be made, he flew and he saved. When less spectacular saves had to be made, he kept his feet on the ground and made those ones too. I wittered on about Romero and the basics of defending; and it strikes me that simply saving goalbound efforts just about encapsulates the basics of Vicario’s JD.

On top of which, I was also most pleasantly surprised by his sudden predilection for distributing the ball in swift and unfussy manner. It was most unexpected. Time and again, Vicario gathered the ball in his mitts and then raced to the edge of the area before popping it off into the path of a chum to run onto, a good 10 yards outside our own area, in behaviour striking for being so breathtakingly sensible, and as such entirely at odds with what we’ve come to expect from the curious little prune.

Contrast this to the blighter’s usual modus operandi, which is to wriggle and scream a few times, before allowing the opposition to settle back into their defensive shape, and then rolling the ball to a defender near enough our own 6-yard box forsooth; or, worse, dropping the ball at his own feet and then fighting the urge to spin and belt it into his own net or along his own goal-line, or something equally insane.

Yesterday, time and again, Vicario took the obvious approach so commonly eschewed, for unfussily posting the ball into the path of a teammate already on the run. How refreshing.

3. Relegation!

Being a cynical sort, I did contemplate that the one chappie of lilywhite persuasion who might actually have greeted Romero’s red card with some relief was Our Glorious Leader himself, on the grounds that for once the rotten fruit was not to be pelted his way. It has simply become part of the AANP post-match routine to sigh one of those world-weary ones, take a deep breath and then start slamming Frank with gusto. Yesterday, with a ready-made villain at whom to aim pelters, Frank was granted a day of respite.

He ought not to become too comfortable though. Our league form remains dire, and I would suggest that in approximately three of every four halves we play, the performances are utterly wretched. Neither the high-flying sides nor the lowly mob strike me as particularly beatable at present by the current N17 vintage. Frankly, if the opponent comprise 11 men with a pulse, I make our heroes firm second-favourites. With 29 points on the board, I struggle to see from where we eke out the required positive performances (across two halves) to drag us up to 40 or so. At the moment, in fact, I’m not entirely convinced we’ll hit 30.

Frank is presumably here to stay, unless we get sucked into the bottom three within the next month or so, and nothing about the chap inspires. It says something about his aura that when our lot do randomly spark into life, I now automatically assume that this is despite rather than because of the influence of our Big Cheese. I attribute it to Simons going rogue, or the wide men drifting into strictly forbidden positions, rather than any words of inspiration from Frank.

It’s all rather ominous. Better, I feel, to start the mental preparation now, for any potential relegation scrap, than to be taken by surprise come late-March.